IT Security & Network Security News & Reviews - eWeek



Cracking the WPA Security Standard





  Table of Contents:
  1. Cracking the WPA Security Standard
  2. Traffic Injection
  3. Location Detection Tools

Analysis: As security researchers prepare to discuss how they were able to subvert the WPA wireless security standard, eWEEK Labs outlines what this means to wireless administrators.

Cracking the WPA Security Standard
( Page 1 of 3 )

At the PacSec conference in Tokyo the week of Nov. 10, researchers Erik Tews and Martin Beck will outline the attack they created to subvert WPA wireless security protections.

Although the attack is limited in scope at this time—as it only affects TKIP (Temporal Key Integrity Protocol)-protected networks and can only be used to inject traffic but not to steal data—there is sure to be significant confusion about the effects of the attack.

In this article, I have outlined five points about the attack and its consequences that are crucial for wireless administrators to understand—about how it works, what its limits are, and what can be done to protect wireless networks and the data they carry from attackers.  

First of all, the attack by Tews and Beck only works against networks protected with TKIP. TKIP, originally called WEP2, was an interim standard adopted to allow wireless users to have an upgrade from the broken WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy) protocol that lets them protect their wireless data without requiring an investment in new hardware. TKIP took the basics of WEP (and therefore uses the same RC4 stream cipher), enforced a longer encryption key, added per-packet keys, boosted the Initialization Vector used to generate keys from 24-bit to 48-bit in length, and added a new Integrity Check checksum (called Michael). 

It is Michael that is at the root of the new attack. The attack, which leverages a modified chop-chop attack that allows the decryption of individual packets without cracking the Pairwise Master key (the shared secret between clients and the network used for encryption), goes after the Pairwise Transient Key protecting the session in order to interpret very small packets (like an ARP) of just a few bytes of unknown data.

The attacker must probe cautiously because Michael will shut down a device for 60 seconds and rekey if it sees two Michael errors within a minute.  However, because there is little to guess in these small packets, the attacker only needs to spend a few minutes (12 to 15 minutes, from what I understand) probing Michael until it stops returning errors. At that point, the attacker can then go to work with the chop-chop attack to get past the integrity check built into the original WEP (that TKIP still uses).

AES-protected networks, on the other hand, are immune to this attack, as AES uses an entirely different keying method called CCMP (Counter Mode with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol).



 
 
>>> More IT Security & Network Security News & Reviews Articles          >>> More By Andrew Garcia
 

FEATURED SPONSOR MESSAGE

Start the New Year with business intelligence—it’s a smart move

Join us on February 1 for an encore rebroadcast at either 5 am or 12 noon EST and discover how business intelligence (BI) supports companies in uncertain business and economic climates. Get expert advice on how to create a strategy that fits your organization's needs and budget and see how quickly it can pay for itself.

Click Here

Brought to you by


eweek digital



Advertisement
 
APPLY FOR A FREE 
SUBSCRIPTION BELOW:

>Try digital eWEEK
>Renew today
>Subscription help
>More FREE Subscriptions
First Name:Last Name:
Title:Company:
Address:City:
State:Zip Code:
Email:
eWEEK Quick LInks