Dynamic Security: Wave of the Future? (
Page 1 of 2 )
SAN FRANCISCO—How
is the data security industry keeping a safe distance ahead of those who revel
in stealing information from companies and individuals and using it for their
own profit?
The current answer is by continually building more business intelligence,
developed and collected by security technology companies, into large
databases and the latest security products that keep watch over
them. The business intelligence is aimed at making the security products
and the databases they protect moving targets that are harder for data pirates
to hit.
But the entire data protection business continues to be a slow-moving work
in progress.
Enterprise Strategy Group security analyst Jon Oltsik believes that enterprise
data security in general is becoming a bit tighter on the surface, but
underneath there remains that soft underbelly of liability.
"Information security progress continues to move one step forward and then
two steps back," Oltsik wrote in his blog. "The worst news of
all is that this isn't a technology issue. It really comes down to negligence,
ignorance, poor processes, and general laziness. To paraphrase security guru
Bruce Schneier, 'People remain the weakest link in the security chain.'"
Oltsik pointed out another disturbing fact: "Five of the 10 [all-time]
biggest data breaches occurred in 2007, including the record setter," he
wrote. "Massachusetts-based
TJX now
holds the dubious honor for the largest data breach of all time—a whopping 94 million
records exposed!"
RSA Security, one of the most respected data
security vendors in the world and now a division of IT infrastructure giant
EMC,
and other security companies have found that while consumers and businesses
remain standardized on static username-and-password entry into online services,
the industry must continue to innovate new techniques to catch crooks.
Who are the 800-pound gorillas of IT? Find out here.
Human error and thievery—not technology—really are the major issues involving
data security,
RSA President Art Coviello
said during a recent visit to eWEEK's office here.
"Good security requires a fair amount of expense, maybe even a fair amount
of frustration on the part of users," Coviello said while offering an
overview of what he sees in the security landscape going forward this year.
"If security is only invoked when and if a risk is identified, then it's a
lot less intrusive," Coviello said. "In our online solutions for
identity [authentication], we're now looking for patterns of behavior, much as
you do in a point-of-sale transaction with a credit card. So we monitor
anomalies in credit-card transactions, and stop those transactions when the
anomaly shows up."
This screening of data and user routines for telltale patterns is something
called "dynamic security."
For instance, Coviello said, if you use your credit card today, and then 5
minutes from now this same card is used to try to buy something from an IP
address in
Moscow,
RSA's
software would flag it and immediately put a stop on it.
"If you buy a pair of Nike sneakers online, no big deal. But if all of a
sudden you're buying 500 pair, we'll probably stop that transaction,"
Coviello said. "That sort of thing."
In the first-generation security world, that kind of transaction likely would
not have been discovered.