EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding said Google's product policy privacy changes violated European data protection laws by failing to gain consumer consent.
The European
Union's Justice Commissioner is certain Google's (NASDAQ:GOOG) new product
policy privacy changes violate European laws and was irked the search giant
executed the changes against the protestations of data protection authorities.
EU
Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding told BBC Radio Four that she believed
Google's changes violate European data laws by failing to consult consumers
making the changes, among other complaints.
Reding's
comments came a few days after French data protection authority CNIL wrote a
letter to Google asking the company to halt the changes, which went into effect
March 1, because the new policies appear to break rules related to how Google
informs users it is using their personal data.
Google
announced its privacy policy changes Jan. 24, vowing to winnow out product
privacy rules from some 60 Web services, such as search, YouTube and Google
Maps, under one umbrella policy.
This policy
aims to treat users of those services who are signed into their Google accounts
as individual users, with services under the blanket policy sharing data with
each other. Google argued this would improve relevancy, and thus, quality of
service to users.
Critics
contend it's just another way for Google to create a better digital dossier on
users to bolster its online ad targeting. Either way, users can go along for
the ride, eschew the services covered under the blanket policy or access some
services while signed out of their Google account.
On the day the
policy went into effect, Reding said she would have preferred Google halt its
implementation until questions about the policy's compliance with EU data
protection rules have been resolved.
"It is
unfortunate that Google has gone ahead with the new policy before addressing
the French data protection authority's concerns," Reding told eWEEK in a statement. "All
companies that offer services to European consumers must provide their
customers with clear information about their privacy policy. In Europe, consumers
must be able to make informed decisions about using Internet-based
services."
However, Google
Global Privacy Counsel Peter Fleischer wrote in a letter to CNIL, that
Google is "confident that our new simple, clear and transparent privacy
policy respects all European data protection laws and principles."
Europe is not
the only continent that is crying foul over Google's new policies.
Steve Pociask,
president of the American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research, wrote
on FoxNews.com that "[Google's] abysmal track record on privacy
demonstrates why consumers, elected officials and privacy experts are appalled
by the change and by their continued indifference to privacy protections. ¦
Unfortunately, Google has proven time and again that if left alone, the company
cannot be trusted to be open and transparent with their customers."
California-based
Google critic Consumer Watchdog called Google's sweeping changes a "spy
policy" rather than a privacy policy, an allusion to the fact that the
move will help Google funnel data on users in one larger silo for targeted ads.
"Google
isn't telling you about protecting your privacy," said John M. Simpson,
Consumer Watchdog's privacy project director. "Google is telling you how
they will gather information about you on all its services, combine it in new
ways and use the fat new digital dossiers to sell more ads."
The chorus of
discontent extended to Congress. In February, U.S. Senators met with Google
Deputy General Counsel Mike Yang and Public Policy Director Pablo Chavez to
discuss the planned policy changes. The Senators believed Google's policy
changes would obscure pertinent information from users.
Last week, some
three-dozen state attorneys general wrote a letter noting they were
concerned with Google's desire to have applications, such as Search, Gmail and
YouTube, share user data with each other.
3 Comments
for "Google Privacy Policy Changes Break European Rules: Reding"
my best friend's half-sister makes $85/hour on the computer. She has been out of work for 9 months but last month her income was $21939 just working on the computer for a few hours. Here's the site to read more LazyCash37.com...
Notice there is more FUD in these articles and less FACT... they claim it violates the law... eh what law ? cite what law it's violating by book/chapter/verse.... I bet they can't because it's all just FUD....
The news has been awash with claims that Google is evil and somehow violating everyones personal privacy. Google gives their products away for free. They have their goals spelled out very clearly when you sign up for their free services. Their privacy policy is also very clear. I have heard people suggest that instead of an opt-out policy Google should have an opt-in policy . What do these people think someone is doing when the register for and accept the policy on the registration pages on Google's sites? Google ask potential new members to accept Google's well stated policies before becoming a member. If people disagree with Google's stated policies and goals they have the right and obligation to decline becoming a member. I know that most people never read the privacy statements on sites when they sign-up and only become incensed when they hear about things on the TV or in the papers. It isn't that all of that information is in small print because it isn't; it's because people are just too lazy or greedy and don't want to take the time and want the product even though they will not comply with the providers requirements. ...
3 Comments for "Google Privacy Policy Changes Break European Rules: Reding"