Real Research or a Marketing Ploy?

By Cameron Sturdevant  |  Posted 2005-08-29 Print this article Print

Opinion: Survey on the effects of regulatory compliance on IT security might provide interesting results but won't inform respondents.

The impact of regulatory compliance on IT security is nearly impossible to measure accurately. However, a research survey launched on Aug. 24 by BindView Corp., The Institute of Internal Auditors and the Computer Security Institute purports to get a baseline assessment of just that. I think the survey results will be interesting—especially to auditors and vendors with compliance products to sell—but Im not sure how much the survey respondents will actually get out of the process. The survey is active now, and I want to preserve the sample selected by the surveys sponsors, so I wont provide the URL here.
I will say that the survey is designed for CSOs, is composed of 30 questions—mostly multiple choice—and is comprehensive in covering all the regulatory bodies that are currently picking over corporate IT and finance departments.
There are two problems with the survey from the point of view of the CSO who is being asked to submit answers. The first is that the survey appears to lack a systematic method for eliciting the actual number of staff hours that are expended to comply with various aspects of complying with regulations. The second problem, as I said above, is that it will likely provide very little real benefit to participants. Companies that have stringent regulatory responsibilities assigned to them by law already know what they are supposed to be doing. This means that the respondents providing data to the third-party sponsors of the research survey wont be getting anything more valuable than that an affirmative response that various businesses in the sample indeed must comply with this or that specific rule. Zotob worm suspects arrested. Click here to read more. In areas of the survey where less is known about the actual requirements of an audit—a common complaint about Sarbanes-Oxley—it appears that, for the time being, its probably enough to demonstrate that a system of controls is in place. When it comes to making decisions about how to comply with regulatory mandates, having more and better information is always better than getting less and poor-quality data. However, the survey I got in my e-mail appears to be a survey of potential customers, rather than an unbiased research tool that will shed light on the best way for companies to meet their responsibilities under the law. eWEEK Labs Technical Director Cameron Sturdevant can be reached at Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest security news, reviews and analysis. And for insights on security coverage around the Web, take a look at Security Center Editor Larry Seltzers Weblog.
Cameron Sturdevant Cameron Sturdevant is the executive editor of Enterprise Networking Planet. Prior to ENP, Cameron was technical analyst at PCWeek Labs, starting in 1997. Cameron finished up as the eWEEK Labs Technical Director in 2012. Before his extensive labs tenure Cameron paid his IT dues working in technical support and sales engineering at a software publishing firm . Cameron also spent two years with a database development firm, integrating applications with mainframe legacy programs. Cameron's areas of expertise include virtual and physical IT infrastructure, cloud computing, enterprise networking and mobility. In addition to reviews, Cameron has covered monolithic enterprise management systems throughout their lifecycles, providing the eWEEK reader with all-important history and context. Cameron takes special care in cultivating his IT manager contacts, to ensure that his analysis is grounded in real-world concern. Follow Cameron on Twitter at csturdevant, or reach him by email at

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters

Rocket Fuel