The question of the day is where the hacker group Anonymous got that list of nearly 60,000 names and passwords since Twitter says it wasn't from them. Or was it some wannabe hacker who got decoyed by a stash of phony data?
The reports this week that the hacker group Anonymous somehow managed to
60,000 user names and passwords
from Twitter and subsequently post them online
are raising more questions than there are answers available.
Clearly, someone or some group got a list of names and passwords that are
purported to be from Twitter. This list of names appeared on Pastebin.com on
Tuesday, put there by an anonymous user.
But when you look at those alleged user names and passwords, the contents of
the list itself raise questions, regardless of whether the group Anonymous
obtained them or whether it was someone else just preferring to remain
anonymous. When you look at the lists (they're here: 1
2 3 4 5
) you'll notice a couple of
important characteristics, such as that virtually none of the passwords matches
25 most popular passwords of 2011
Of course, a few here and there match the top 25, but only a few. If this
had been a real list of users and passwords, the expectation would be for a
very high percentage. Instead, nearly all of them qualify as strong, hard (or
impossible) to remember passwordssomething highly unlikely.
The next thing you'll notice on the list is that nearly all of the email
addresses are from free services such as Hotmail or Gmail. Only a tiny
percentage appears to be real email addresses. If this were a list of real
Twitter users, you'd expect a higher ratio of addresses from other types of
Internet providers and companies.
So even without Twitter's comment that the list is bogus, it's possible to
tell from a close examination of the list that the chances of it being real are
vanishingly small. But add that to the fact that apparently 20,000 of the
entries on the list are duplicates and most of the rest are users who have been
bounced from Twitter, and you have to wonder exactly where this list came from.
There is speculation that Anonymous is retaliating against Twitter for
bouncing spammers. But I don't think this is the case. For one thing, the folks
who are associated with Anonymous aren't dumb. They can look at a list like
this and see that it's clearly fake.
This raises the question of whether the hacker group Anonymous was even
involved at all. I suspect it wasn't, if only because the group wouldn't have
made a mistake this basic. Instead, I think that the fact that the person who
posted the list is anonymous in the lower case sense shows they just don't want
anyone to know who they are.