The User Account Control feature in Microsoft Windows 7 is irking some in the security community who say Microsoft may have traded security for usability.Concerns about the User Account Control feature in Microsoft
Windows 7 have resurfaced.
UAC first appeared in Windows Vista as a way to bolster
Windows security by limiting standard user privileges until an administrator
authorizes a privilege level increase. In
Windows 7, Microsoft adjusted the feature to provide the user with four
choices for the UAC prompt and set the default setting to notify the user when
programs are attempting to change settings.
However Microsoft's
changes to UAC have set off red flags for some. In response to complaints
about usability, Microsoft changed the feature to reduce the number of
notifications for common activities, such as installing applications from
Internet Explorer, explained Paul Cooke, director of Windows Client Enterprise
Security at Microsoft.
"We have also made it easier for administrators to look
at specific Windows settings on the system without needing administrative
privileges by refactoring many of our control panel applications to separate
interfaces for viewing system settings from those that modify them," he
said.
But Ray Dickenson, CTO of
Authentium, blogged those changes have
come with a security cost.
"My personal observation as a user is that Windows 7 is
much more pleasant to use than Vista However, as is nearly always the case,
increasing operating system usability also increases security risksrisks of
infection and compromise of data and functionality," Dickenson blogged. "The
changes to Windows 7 UAC have made it easy for malware writers to turn UAC off
entirely without the user's knowledge. Microsoft recommends keeping UAC turned
on and yet allows malware to turn it off without the user's knowledge."
Earlier in 2009, Windows bloggers Rafael
Rivera and Long Zheng posted proof-of-concept code that circumvented UAC in
the Windows 7 beta, allowing attackers to use pre-approved Microsoft
applications to trick the operating system into granting malware full access
rights.
Sophos Security Advisor Chester Wisniewski agreed with the
duo in a white paper, stating that "malware has been observed spoofing
UAC-style prompts to obtain user permission to operate unimpeded."
Wisniewski wrote, "The UAC concept is user-driven
rather than expert-driven, so it is a questionable approach in a world where
end-user expertise is rare ... Although personal files and tools will require
user approval and operation, core system assets should be more rigorously
protected."
In an interview with eWEEK, he added that the UAC controls
reduce the number of pop-ups but are "less effective at stopping malware
than in Vista if you ignore the flesh between keyboard
and chair."
He added, "Vista's UAC was so
nag-prone that you became numb to it very quickly. I just re-installed [Windows
7] on my laptop and only had a small number of UAC prompts through loading my
entire enterprise application load. Much better."
Cooke said Microsoft's approach with Windows 7 was to give users
more control over the number of prompts they receive and to make the
prompts more meaningful when they appear by quieting the system in general.
"Before UAC was introduced, most Windows consumer and
enterprise users ran with administrative rights, which meant that ISVs could
inadvertently make their applications dependent on administrative rights,"
he said. "Applications running with administrative rights have the
ability to tamper with all user and Windows system data, including the ability
to disable antivirus and other security measures ... [UAC] gives users a more
compatible choice to secure their systems by running with standard user rights
instead of administrator rights."
| | Reader Comments: Windows 7 UAC Security Feature Raises Concerns | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | the flesh?I don't agree with the idea that its the flesh's fault that an operating system's security (not designed by said user "flesh") should be the one... Posted At: 10-27-09 By: Lawrence Knowlton | | | | | | Working Exactly as MS PlannedI actually think MS planned this out. Sure people screamed about UAC being to paranoid but the entire purpose behind UAC wasn't to ensure users... Posted At: 10-27-09 By: Fast Turtle | | | | | | A user comment on this articledon't blame the customer for the product defect, this is microsoft's fault and problem to deal with... Posted At: 10-27-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | A user comment on this articleThis is the most absurd article I have ever read. How can you even write something like this. After all the complaining you did with Vista's UAC... Posted At: 10-26-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | Communication ProblemWhen the security problem is between the keyboard and the chair its not an operating system problem its a communication problem. You need to educate... Posted At: 10-26-09 By: Shane | | | | | | Ding dong the witch is deadUAC was a failure simply because average users - heck, advanced users - never once understood (in the least) what any of its nagging intrusions were... Posted At: 10-26-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | Hopefully sooner than later...Appreciate your comments. UAC really is a vexation of Microsoft's own design that started with Windows 95. Microsoft saw no problem with letting... Posted At: 10-26-09 By: blarman | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |