It's already unusual that such old products are still supported, and it's astonishing they will get security updates for five more years. But still things will be different from here on out.Pay special attention to Patch Tuesday this month. It's the end of mainstream support for Windows XP and Office 2003.
Obviously Microsoft would always want us all to move to new products
quickly, but that doesn't often happen, and they don't make us do it.
In fact, Office 2003 will be getting security updates for five more years, through April 8, 2014, the same date security fixes for Windows XP end. (Five years! You wonder how big a deal it will be at the time.)
But after this month a lot of support for Office 2003 and Windows XP
does end: Non-security hotfix support will now require an extended
hotfix agreement, purchased within 90 days of April 14. Also no-charge
incident support, warranty claims and design changes and feature
requests all end. It's hard to believe they've been taking design
changes and feature requests for these products seriously for a while
though.
We will enter these products' "Extended support phases" in which
only online support and security updates come for free. Versions of
Windows Server 2003 with old service packs will also lose some support
on that date.
Nobody has support lifecycles like Microsoft's. All their major
competitors toss you out on your butt years before Microsoft does.
Consider the fact that Office 2000 with Internet Explorer 5.01 running
on Windows 2000 is still a supported configuration for Microsoft.
"Supported" in this case means that they still get security updates and
contract support, including hotfix support, is available. This period
for Windows 2000 will end on July 13, 2010, more than 10 years after
the product was released. Don't say you weren't warned. Finally, for
those of you still running Office 2000, Extended Support, and with it
security updates, ends on July 14 of 2009, just about 10 years after
release.
They don't offer such long support periods because it's a good idea
for them or for, as they like to put it, the "ecosystem." It's because
they try not to push their customers around.
Actually, in some cases, Sun has support lifecycles on par with
Microsoft's. Solaris versions have extremely long support lives. Just
last week Solaris 8, released in February 2000, reached "End of Service
Life Phase 2," meaning that customers have to buy the "Solaris 8
Vintage Patch Service" if they want to receive any updates, including
security updates. The complete support shut-off is scheduled for March,
2012.
Support lifecycle for StarOffice is harder to determine, and I think
they may not have a formal policy. In any event, I can't find an
on-point statement on their Website. They do offer "3 free warranty
support calls (in retail)" for StarOffice 9. On the other hand, there hasn't been a patch for StarOffice 8 for almost two years (May 2007) and it was released in September 2005, according to Wikipedia.
Wikipedia also has a handy chart of Fedora and Fedora Core versions
showing which are still supported, and it shows that Fedora 8, released
in November 2007, is no longer supported. That's a pretty short cycle.
Long cycles such as Microsoft's are rare in the industry. Focusing
only on security I would argue that they should shorten them, since
it's easy to demonstrate (and a Microsoft study released this week will
show this) that the more recent versions are uniformly less
exploitable. But they give you all that extra time, so take it and use
it to update.
Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer has worked in and written about the computer industry since 1983.
For insights on security coverage around the Web, take a look at eWEEK.com Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer's blog Cheap Hack.
| | Reader Comments: Windows XP and Office 2003 Enter a New Phase of Support | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | A user comment on this articleThis articles mention of other products seems akin to trolling for M$ yes staroffice 8 does not have patches, but costs a fraction of ms to buy and... Posted At: 04-10-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | computers can last far longer than 5 yearsMost people (who aren't techo-egotists or gamers) buy a computer to accomplish something more efficiently than they could do "by hand" or by some... Posted At: 04-10-09 By: Richard | | | | | | Linux life cyclesYes, the Fedora life cycle is pretty short. It's intended to be a leading edge distro. Besides, upgrading is *free*. The other difference is that,... Posted At: 04-09-09 By: Samuel | | | | | | they've got to be realisticComputers are becoming commodity items and it's likely that people WILL keep them for more than five years (can you imagine anyone other than a... Posted At: 04-09-09 By: jay | | | | | | Microsoft's support cycles ...are an appropriate amount of time in my opinion. Especially, in the case of the operating system. I stopped purchasing Symantec products because... Posted At: 04-09-09 By: RR | | | | | | XP SupportLike anything a product has a life. I have used Vista and XP and I find XP more stable. They just plan on you buying a program every 5 years. They... Posted At: 04-06-09 By: Curt K | | | | | | life cyclesHi, I'm Larry Seltzer. How far into the life cycle do you keep products active on your own network? Posted At: 04-06-09 By: Larry Seltzer | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |