|
|
|

FCC Questions Comcast's VOIP Policy
By: Roy Mark
2009-01-20
Article Rating:    / 15
There are 19 user comments on this VOIP & Telephony story.
The Federal Communications Commission raises the possibility of further network neutrality violations by Comcast. The agency is investigating concerns that Comcast's new network management practices degrade the sound quality of VOIP services such as Vonage and Skype that compete with Comcast's own VOIP service. Cable giant Comcast may again be in network neutrality hot water
with the Federal Communications Commission. The agency is
investigating concerns that Comcast's new network management practices
degrade the sound quality of VOIP (voice over IP) services such as
Vonage and Skype that compete with Comcast's own VOIP service.
In a Jan. 17 letter to Comcast, the FCC told Comcast to provide "a detailed justification for
Comcast's disparate treatment of its own VOIP service as compared to
that offered by other VOIP providers on its network." The FCC
also wants to know why the company has failed to disclose "the distinct effects that
Comcast's new network management technique has on Comcast's VOIP
offering versus those of its competitors."
Comcast's network management practices have been under review since the FCC declared Aug. 1 Comcast was violating the agency's Internet policy when it blocked P2P traffic by BitTorrent. The agency also found
that Comcast misled consumers when it did not properly disclose its P2P
policy. While Comcast was not fined for the network neutrality violation, the FCC ordered Comcast to cease the practice and to keep the public informed of its future network management plans.
According to Comcast, its new protocol-agnostic network management
policies allow for slowing network traffic during heavily congested
traffic periods that could make "VOIP call sounds choppy" when routing
packets through congested areas of the network. Comcast's own VOIP
service, though, will be unaffected by the network policy.
"Critically, [Comcast] draws no distinction between Comcast's VOIP offering and those offered by its competitors," the FCC said in the letter to Comcast.
"To the extent that Comcast maintains that its VOIP offering is a
telephone service offering transmission facilities for VOIP calls
distinct from Comcast's broadband offering, then it would appear the
fee Comcast assesses its customers for VOIP pays in part for the
privileged transmission of information of the customer's choosing
across Comcast's network."
The FCC ordered Comcast to reply to the inquiry by Jan. 30. A
Comcast spokesman said, "We have fully complied with the FCC's order
regarding our congestion
management practices. We are reviewing the FCC staff's letter."
Free Press, which successfully pursued the BitTorrent network
neutrality case before the FCC, outlined similar VOIP concerns in an October letter filed with the FCC after Comcast made its new network
management practices public. Free Press also expressed concern over
Comcast's different treatment of video services and urged further
investigation into the company's new practices.
Ben Scott, policy director of Free Press, said in a Jan. 19
statement the FCC letter to Comcast "is a positive sign that the FCC's
Comcast decision was not a one-and-done action on net neutrality. An
open Internet cannot tolerate arbitrary
interference from Internet service providers. Congress and the FCC must
close any legal loopholes that permit anti-competitive behavior to
thrive."
In
August 2005, the FCC declared that consumers are entitled to access the
lawful Internet content of their choice, run applications and services
of their choice and plug in and run legal devices of their choice. The
FCC also said consumers have a right to competition among network
providers, application and service providers and content providers.
| | Reader Comments: FCC Questions Comcast's VOIP Policy | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | What can I DO?as a happy user of Vonage for years I see the service value drop
Even with paying Comcast for 10 Gig.
the loss of 911 access and the loss of... Posted At: 02-17-09 By: ETHOM NC | | | | | | Not just ComcastTime Warner is doing the exact same thing. Get the FCC on their neck too! Their excuse was that the trouble was with interference from the Vonage... Posted At: 01-27-09 By: William Bassett | | | | | | No pots call is outside FCC regulationYour both right and possibly a little wrong too.
1) Comcast can deliver COMCAST VOIP w/o touching the public Internet back bone.
2) Current... Posted At: 01-26-09 By: Tom | | | | | | A user comment on this articleOn the first point, the poster asserts: "Comcast asserts (and I believe it's 100% correct) that the FCC does not have the authority to regulate the... Posted At: 01-26-09 By: IdiotBuster | | | | | | Work for Comcast do you?These people had workable service before Comcast set limits on specific traffic, therefore Comcast is limiting their choice of carrier. This is... Posted At: 01-26-09 By: Bozo D Clone | | | | | | Time Warner Cable likewiseI e-mailed complaints to both the FCC and the FTC last week that Time Warner Cable is degrading my Vonage service. Specifically, people tell me that... Posted At: 01-26-09 By: Gus Gilbert | | | | | | AbsurdClearly, you don't understand how IP services are delivered. If you did, you would indeed know that ComCast can deliver VoIP services *without*... Posted At: 01-26-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |
|
|
xv㶲 VQfG)RwjlmؖcP$$1Hnsy* BKt:{-R@
PxCggDlU7 9IIvfCj.5蝗%y歯 i3Wdvu63Jh4=G RQu=jf4jʹ u[;#|c9o;| `OS;S-uɔ, \:}nnb-bX:XC#: rWݸ%`fF\Qh]m(
)8ijMCoIAmg|{Pdd=3՝B,!|@JJk4ދ 䣎e34ʀY뻝F
z\]~j
1Շ22mhj*N`QƞdnڭcŠ~3a ٷ]
GgJ=s;'-jb'*Dp'0٦Q#@fSTH͌ՙaBwTP}⩖QmyKu7|($g4.vߟFK78/0/`>4GA
Gj mGkh[#bCq={'r9;{+Z;A7@n&1`jLTW*bcg"SmjAG'Y_5}(~㖯[zRkhqnaE4f%W,X~6t.˫nCënl,a|Z( ?T
2ؕgxkh[:O9ǽ>9]QɞFTpgsZZr`Ck'^ĻInXC9 C-0
ϖjr]g!3|;|쐩.?uHF,ɯ3`U-@mܹȐL\9ȃ+a屲(93i)=m8oY@/@ש!A5Wt"_y۬)Uu>rB*ܸmf 49̠蟩$m4@rXSl RNF/,.|i*b
q"A[}O%ތ!E\r+yzTB(pHqb#'${_E1\fU[<<|twެ.Uմީ.~iI֤ui>\uIwN~߁)CEhYf7-vIaIusӱP#h2,%JhrS2d8,0ӱ:79lA&:uTgNgT7HXj |$>hFƋEriM
rӇtvA>|g;եn]=&:7 pN=HfP=H*}mP`ٮ$U'A
ϛ̀-s%08w{ɭ5z90ݻ#iz`y1&}դ; TgP ,u]=
w@L߽1#ުL<ĥ\;x?ʜ+)
Xt]JIQt"D% P
h4AfZE|ENmbo$'w$]/Vp`(7ݞH:'0_.ߗKhF3aGe-n^
d6g2ILIMV-&DvoK7],Slo3-Muc{TRBRO
&tcC3` {@Zgùa
K0:>9V?b!s WQ'c: ?q;\ύ>ס!n~mt08.fXfZ1kwJaò@du1nSC
R
g?0-qڛw8AyTXh7%3Ͱ&Sq_;+ogzbr傩&>|YzY4 y_.MMUPS7˕L8+UPM
g2)*[hs< 8:[Ȭ,N7 \YYb~AJ=LEj~#JwCUoxé=h{q#%NA{=e河x_Ou+XKnuI8Ұ.@\$72Bɶ/^[aaPK~噎ŗZZG"JM`}.EK#1^`/ahQжCjaaCg R϶7>2ei[arA)T9,Wfn
(Y`AE}f&$
=mꝹOc>C ]G1`;SۋhpLa)e ֤(kfb:X[^=' ˖X
ȁU|qh3Plia?,{E[Iq:O: V!2 LsCm0dž "U=|XGL{R>_F_ab>!N Dȸla,Ce9ִ &=MӾK'zfdz QO+_&5K4uD81F]-OA5_hJvg^n^0*Lly.|=vVV0\h}NДa˘=2|tדmOL*IRQQ*1KkMfGUWOeSah"pHE1AxZkhpLy@\TZr>JVDD06pl)TیЄro_`wc* :@!G:DJ EWY)oS9]P4*SkP@xA5u8w=X\``!>iV3Hka5Y[f^k<~iλM^,?CQT^;cf;w,Ԟm$R*9g7gMH]aym $L},S([[4M.а4>s'}&no{yBoG=sAɴ:(6<|o
*VˡɘrX@bK>k~:Kl[/s0X3f~kty{ z&wUfǿ ܵtzϡR@71dc0̞̞A
mۨX916?0TwgU}̇'S$GRT(@@lj%nG'a>&rn:kOJ}O4#%O)LU*JX]ш3A H 2vBs=Q<CRpz., |