Ideally, the cloud versus on-premises debate should fade away. Can Microsoft's Exchange Online strategy fulfill cloud computing's platform-agnostic promise?
some time with Microsoft's forthcoming Exchange Online service, I've been
thinking about the promise-as well as the current reality-of the company's
software-plus-services strategy for addressing IT's apparently cloud-filled
The software-plus-services pitch goes something like this: Rather than dive
headfirst into cloud-based services, organizations and individuals should
pursue a blended strategy, based on traditional on-premises software,
complemented by hosted services where appropriate.
This strategy makes a lot of sense, since it's unwise to place any
particular platform above the tasks you're looking to accomplish. Ideally, the
cloud versus on-premises debate should fade into the background, and
organizations should focus instead on running the applications they require on
whatever combination of platforms is best suited to their goals.
However, considering Microsoft's history of tying the platforms and the
applications that it produces more tightly than is necessary or helpful, I'm
skeptical about whether Microsoft is prepared to help build this sort of
Take, for instance, Exchange Online, which lacks the automatic
on-premises-to-cloud failover capabilities I would find most helpful from a
software-plus-services offering, but which is more tightly tied to Windows on
the client side than the regular on-premises version of Exchange.
With my own Exchange-based mailbox, I currently use both POP3
and IMAP to weave Exchange into my non-Windows devices, and as far as I can
tell, neither of those options is available with Exchange Online. The service
does, however, rely on IMAP for migrating messages into Exchange Online.
If software-plus-services is to boil down to: Come for the services, but you're
not getting away without some software, and by the way, that software runs only
on Windows-then it's going to be tough for Microsoft to participate in the
lower-barriers world that cloud computing can make possible.
Now, Exchange Online is not yet out of beta, and Microsoft may well adapt it
toward greater client agnosticism. Microsoft's recent move to expand the Open
Specification Promise under which the company released a sheaf of
interoperability protocol specifications to include commercial as well as
noncommercial uses was certainly a promising development.
With regard to Exchange, I'd love to see Microsoft push its interoperability
initiative further by opening up Exchange ActiveSync licensing and inviting
users of all client platforms into the product's customer base.
eWEEK Labs Executive Editor Jason Brooks can be
reached at email@example.com.
As Editor in Chief of eWEEK Labs, Jason Brooks manages the Labs team and is responsible for eWEEK's print edition. Brooks joined eWEEK in 1999, and has covered wireless networking, office productivity suites, mobile devices, Windows, virtualization, and desktops and notebooks. Jason's coverage is currently focused on Linux and Unix operating systems, open-source software and licensing, cloud computing and Software as a Service. Follow Jason on Twitter at jasonbrooks, or reach him by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.