Google tried to effect a position of neutrality in a 65-page filing concerning the Federal Communications Commission's authority to regulate broadband providers, but hinted that the agency should consider classifying broadband as a common carrier service. This would prohibit broadband providers from discriminating in charges, practices, classifications, regulations, facilities or services for their communication services. This goes to the heart of the network neutrality issue Google has been aggressively promoting to make sure users have the best opportunities possible to access its search and other Web applications.
Google tried to effect a position of neutrality in a 65-page filing
concerning the Federal Communications Commission's authority to regulate broadband
providers, but hinted that the agency should consider classifying broadband as
a common carrier service.
Google, who argues that carriers should not have the right to block or
stymie access to its Websites and applications, said the FCC has ample legal
authority to adopt broadband openness rules and that it supports whatever
jurisdictional fix is "most sustainable legally."
"To us this has never been about regulatory rigidity but about
protecting consumers and keeping the Internet open for innovators," noted
Rick Whitt, Washington telecom and media counsel, in a
blog post April 26. "So while we're not wed to any
particular legal theory to justify the FCC's jurisdiction, we do believe some
minimal oversight over broadband networks is essential."
The Washington Post's Cecilia Kang detected more of Google's plans than what
was outlined in the brief blog post. Kang
noted that Google suggested that the FCC reclassify broadband as
a Title II common carrier service, something broadband providers would no doubt
resist with aggressive litigation.
Carriers do not want to be told how to handle the data they shuttle on their
networks. Google said that it would be unwise for the FCC to continue relying
on its Title I authority to adopt the proposed broadband openness rules.
"The FCC should consider a number of options, including pursuing a
decision grounded in whole or in part on its unquestioned authority under
existing statutory titles, including Title II," Google
wrote in this April 26 filing.
This would prohibit broadband providers from discriminating in charges,
practices, classifications, regulations, facilities or services for their
communication services.
This, of course, embodies the network neutrality issue Google has been
aggressively promoting to make sure users have the best opportunities possible
to access its search and other Web applications.
The FCC saw its regulatory authority over broadband providers blistered by
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which
ruled April 6 that the FCC did not have the
authority to order Comcast to stop throttling BitTorrent traffic and that
Comcast could regulate Internet traffic over its own system.
The FCC in 2008 had complained that Comcast and other Internet providers
must treat content that traverses their pipes equally. Comcast took the FCC to
the court and won, with the court claiming the FCC had overstepped its
boundaries by claiming Comcast violated FCC network neutrality policies.
Nearly a month later, this ruling has FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski
leaning toward maintaining the current regulatory structure of
broadband Internet service instead of extending its purview.
The Washington Post said the chairman thinks "reclassifying" would
serve as an investment deterrent for broadband providers. In other words, the
FCC appears to be caving to the big companies who control the data pipes.
This would be a resounding blow to FCC network neutrality principles that
prohibit broadband providers from blocking users from accessing and sharing
lawful content and applications from any devices.
Google was
initially quiet about the court's decision to strike down the
FCC's plans. The company's suggestion that the FCC push common carrier status
on ISPs, buried as it was in the filing, shows the company fears the loss of
network neutrality.