Sun Branding Effort Angers Java Crowd

 
 
By Darryl K. Taft  |  Posted 2003-09-29 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Sun is taking heat from developers for its Java-branding plans.

Sun Microsystems Inc. will face fireworks at the Java Community Process meetings and elections this week over its Java branding intentions.

The JCP is holding scheduled elections to replace the current members making up the Micro Edition Executive Committee and the Standard Edition/Enterprise Edition Executive Committee. Both committees oversee the working groups that craft Java standards.

But the elections could be overshadowed by an increasingly anxious developer community, angry with Sun over its announced plans to tack the Java name on specific products—a move Sun has long fought against.

Sun has named its new software stacks after Java—Java Enterprise System and its desktop companion, Java Desktop System—even though the software is not exclusively Java-based.

"From an observer point of view, what theyre doing is innovative," said George Paolini, vice president of Java technology at Borland Software Corp., of Scotts Valley, Calif., and a former Sun executive who used to run the JCP. "As a customer, we were surprised with the approach theyre taking with the use of the Java brand, using it in a way only they can enjoy and others cant. We should be able to come out with the Borland Java Server or the Borland Java brand."

Read Sean Gallaghers column Will Java Roast on An Open Fire?
Discuss this in the eWEEK forum. Another Borland official agreed. "Sun is confusing customers," said Bill Pataky, director of product management for Java solutions. "They are branding products that are not Java. They are diluting the Java brand at the expense of the community."

Paolini made his concerns known to the JCP last week, officials said. A company spokeswoman said she was, however, unsure whether Paolini would make it to the JCP meeting this week in Burlington, Mass.

Some larger Java supporters such as IBM and BEA Systems Inc. declined to comment, but others did not shy from the controversy.

"I dont think theres any problem with the use of Java to label the enterprise system," said Rick Ross, president of Javalobby Inc., a Cary, N.C., Java advocacy organization, who testified for Sun in its antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. "Rather, the conflicts are about the use of the term in their Java Desktop System."

In a posting to the Javalobby Web site, Ross said: "If Microsoft, IBM or any other company had attempted to use the Java name in this way, there would have been hell to pay. Why isnt the JCP empowered to prevent Sun from what looks like flagrant abuse of the term that they have so often promised to protect the meaning of?"

Next page: Sun: We own the Java brand.



 
 
 
 
Darryl K. Taft covers the development tools and developer-related issues beat from his office in Baltimore. He has more than 10 years of experience in the business and is always looking for the next scoop. Taft is a member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and was named 'one of the most active middleware reporters in the world' by The Middleware Co. He also has his own card in the 'Who's Who in Enterprise Java' deck.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Thanks for your registration, follow us on our social networks to keep up-to-date
Rocket Fuel