If the feds took the bailout approach to failing dot-coms in 2001, what would the world look like now?What if the government had spent $750 billion to bail out
the dot-com companies when the Internet bubble collapsed in 2001?
Ive been
thinking about this as Ive watched the feds run the spectrum from rugged free
market individualist (tough luck, Lehman Brothers, dont let the door hit your
butt on the way out) to a socialist bankers paradise (we cant fail as long as
the U.S. Treasury has ink and paper). Were those dot-com companies too
important and too big to fail?
If that had been the decision, Id guess the
world would look something like this.
Webvan
Thank goodness the feds decided to bail out Webvan from its
2001 bankruptcy with a $10 billion cash infusion. Unless the online delivery
grocery business was preserved, it was clear what a terrible food crisis we
would all be now having. While people would be able to order their groceries
online, without Webvan there would be no way to get those groceries from the
stores to the homes. Grocery stores would be awash in undelivered inventory as
no one could think of a way to travel from a house to a store to get those
packages. There would have been a food surplus (at the store) and a food
shortage (at the home) of unimaginable proportions that the United States would
have had to fix.
A few entrepreneurs may have considered an economy where
people drive to the stores with a shopping list, but economic experts didnt
see much of a chance of this catching on. Government economists estimate that
it costs the Treasury $150 to deliver every $10 order of beer and chips, which
is expected to decrease at 1 percent per year.
Pets.com
The countryside would be crawling with starving, crazed,
dangerous pets if the government had not decided to prop up Pets.com with $2
billion in funding in 2000. While similar to the Webvan problem of how to
bridge the gap between the hungry pooch at home and the warehouse full of dog food,
the pet crisis had an additional, far more sinister twist. Little did
homeowners know that when the cute little dog sock puppet got hungry, the pet
owner suddenly started to look a lot like dinner.
Again, it was government
funding that came to the rescue by buying its own fleet of dog and cat food
trucks to deliver the supplies. Quick thinking all around.
CMGi
Of course, the vital venture capital funding pipeline would
have faltered and failed without the governments decision to pump $50 billion
into CMGi. The revolutionary idea that companies dont need products, expertise
or sales was a concept that had to be preserved and encouraged. Without the
governments willingness to step in and grow the dot-com company creation
economy, startups would have been forced to come up with real products for
which real customers would plunk down real cash. Arent we glad that never
happened?
Comdex
And where would the tech industry be without the feds
decision to pour $5 billion (and counting) into the Comdex trade show in Las
Vegas? Comdex is the only place where buyers and
sellers can confab over drinks, and it is impossible to consider that any other
location or venue beyond Las Vegas would be a sensible site for techies to see
the new toys.
By subsidizing a yearly event where every techie in the world
gets a free trip to Vegas, not only is the tech industry assured of continued
survival, but the concepts of the endless buffet, the Elvis impersonator and
the lap dance have advanced all of civilization.
Anyway, you get the idea. Sometimes bailing out the folks
who got us into the mess doesnt seem to make too much sense.
| | Reader Comments: What If the Feds Bailed Out the Busted Dot-coms? | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | not worth writing....not relevant.....sad to think the issues are the same....the 2 are not comparable and should not be compared. Posted At: 10-27-08 By: phil | | | | | | | | | | | | A user comment on this articleWith the passage of time, we are comfortable joking about the dot com bust, and all the business ideas that, in retrospect, seem silly or... Posted At: 10-21-08 By: Anonymous | | | | | | A user comment on this articleI think this article is wonderful. Unfortunately this situation really was based in Congress seeing their own paychecks in jeopardy. That is why they... Posted At: 10-21-08 By: Anonymous | | | | | | Weakest LinkThere was a time when it was accepted that Capitalism was made stronger by the elimination of those with bad judgement and poor skills. Apparently,... Posted At: 10-21-08 By: Gary | | | | | | "facts"The "facts" are that the Clinton adnministration was pursuing antitrust action against Microsoft but Microsoft was able to use delaying tactics until... Posted At: 10-21-08 By: JW | | | | | | | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |