Five Reasons Why Android Could Kill Windows Mobile - It's an App, App World (
Page 2 of 2 )
It’s an App, App World
Microsoft originally planned to have 600 applications available for Windows
Marketplace's October launch. It ended up with a shade fewer than 250, although
that number has expanded to 800 nearly two months after the operating system’s
release. Some 1,000 ISVs are currently registered to build mobile applications
for the storefront.
Considering the massive head start of the other players in the space, mobile
applications were always going to be something of an Achilles heel for Windows
Mobile. Even so, with the exception of Apple's App Store and its 80,000 apps,
Windows Mobile’s 800 apps make substantial inroads against RIM's BlackBerry App
World and its 1,000-plus apps and overtake Palm’s 350-and-counting mobile
applications.
All those competing devices, however, bind their operating systems—and by
extension, third-party applications—to proprietary hardware. Google Android is
the open-source exception, and for that reason was always slated to be
something of a wild card; if the operating system was shunned by phone
manufacturers, then the Android Marketplace would likely not climb far beyond
the 2,000-plus applications currently available. If Android maintains its
growth, then there’s a high potential for the number of Android-centric
applications to explode.
If that happens, more manufacturers will feel compelled to load their
devices with Android, which in turn would squeeze the market for Windows Mobile
even further.
Lack of Other OS Competitors
On Oct. 21, the Symbian Foundation announced
that it was working to adapt the Symbian OS as an open-source platform. The
platform microkernel, EKA2 (Epco Kernel Architecture 2), has been released
"nine months ahead of schedule," according to the Foundation, and
includes a supporting development kit under the Eclipse Public License.
As previously mentioned, though, the market share of the Symbian OS has been
falling drastically over the past year, along with that of Windows Mobile. That
leaves a lot of open territory for Android to theoretically seize—especially
given that there are no other major competitors, either proprietary or
open-source, trying to port an operating system onto mobile phones in the United
States.
The Hardware Pairing
Google Android has been paired to two pieces of hardware—the
Motorola Droid and the HTC Droid Eris—that some early pundits cited as
potential "iPhone killers." While reviews of the actual devices were a
bit more tempered in their praise and Apple-eating potential, the fact remains
that Android is now associated with an instantly recognizable device, which is
good for its brand. During its first week on sale, Verizon Wireless and
Motorola sold 250,000 Droids, substantially less than the 1.6 million iPhone
3GS units moved during its own first week, but
viewed by many analysts as an impressive showing for the new smartphone.
Windows Mobile lacks such a device. For a long time, rumors have circulated
about “Project Pink,” a Microsoft-Verizon smartphone—or smartphones—that could
make its debut early in 2010. In September, Engadget postulated the devices would have
a slider form factor, while 9to5Mac suggested the devices would be
developed hand-in-hand with subsidiary Danger.
But until Microsoft finally confirms "Pink's" existence, or one of
the phones leaks into the hands of journalists, the project remains vaporware,
and Android gains further mindshare with each passing week that Droid
advertisements plaster television, Web page banners and bus sides. If
Google issues its own branded smartphone before Microsoft, this mindshare
will only accelerate.
Windows Mobile 7 Is an Unknown
Microsoft has promised that Windows Mobile 7 will be a substantial update,
even as it continues to keep details closely under wraps. Once the curtain is
whipped back, if the mobile OS’ update fails to impress the general public,
Microsoft could find itself in an almost untenably weak position within the
mobile space. That would give Android the opening it needs to ingratiate itself
even further among smartphone users, and Mobile—in
many ways already on the proverbial ropes—would find itself in very serious
trouble.