It Is Becoming a Virtual World

 
 
By John Taschek  |  Posted 2003-03-03 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Now we're seeing a huge shake-up in the virtualization space.

Microsoft became a virtual company with its recent acquisition of Connectix. Its only a matter of time before Microsoft positions Windows as the core operating system capable of virtualizing and managing Linux server distributions.

The thought is not crazy. IBM pseudo-virtualized Windows 3.0 with OS/2 in 1990. With that failure, the virtual world settled down. Companies such as VMware and Connectix enabled desktop users to run instances of operating systems and applications in a virtual environment. It was bliss for those developing or requiring applications of one platform while using another.

Desktop virtualization, however, is only one application, and as such, its merely an evolution of the multiboot capabilities that are now rolled into every operating system. The second kind of virtualization happens at the server level, in which Unix system resources are virtualized, giving servers mainframelike resource provisioning capabilities.

Now were seeing a huge shake-up in the virtualization space. The focus on virtualization is shifting from the desktop space to the server side. Meanwhile, Unix virtualization capabilities are being folded into blade computers that also run x86 processors. Server virtualization technology is one of the underpinnings of what has become known as utility computing.

On the desktop side, we have to wonder what Microsoft will do with Connectix, a company better known for making it possible to run Windows applications on the Macintosh. It appears Microsoft will roll the Connectix virtualization technology deep inside the Windows stack. That technology will allow Windows computers to run multiple operating systems on the same system, giving Microsoft yet another way to charge for Windows servers: Run Linux under Windows—chalk up another Windows sale.

Until the acquisition, VMware was the hotter company in virtualization, and most people thought Microsoft would buy VMware. Unfortunately, VMware frequently demonstrated its technology by crashing Windows with a "blue screen" application, proving that VMwares technology could do Windows better than Windows, a la IBM. Oops.

Where will this lead us? It appears the advantages in any operating system will be blurred through the evolution of virtualization technologies.

Whats better—virtualization or application emulation? Write to me at john_taschek@ziffdavis.com.

 
 
 
 
As the director of eWEEK Labs, John manages a staff that tests and analyzes a wide range of corporate technology products. He has been instrumental in expanding eWEEK Labs' analyses into actual user environments, and has continually engineered the Labs for accurate portrayal of true enterprise infrastructures. John also writes eWEEK's 'Wide Angle' column, which challenges readers interested in enterprise products and strategies to reconsider old assumptions and think about existing IT problems in new ways. Prior to his tenure at eWEEK, which started in 1994, Taschek headed up the performance testing lab at PC/Computing magazine (now called Smart Business). Taschek got his start in IT in Washington D.C., holding various technical positions at the National Alliance of Business and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. There, he and his colleagues assisted the government office with integrating the Windows desktop operating system with HUD's legacy mainframe and mid-range servers.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel