Microsoft and Google's crossfire this week over Bing illustrates the importance both companies place on their online offerings.
Any doubts about Microsoft's seriousness in its online
efforts should have been dispelled this week, after the company lashed back at
Google's accusations that Bing, Microsoft's search engine, copies its
"I didn't expect that Microsoft would deny the claims so
strongly," Google Principal Engineer Matt Cutts wrote in a Feb. 3 posting on
his personal blog. "One comment that I've heard is that -it's whiny for
Google to complain about this.' I agree that's a risk, but at the same time I
think it's important to go on the record about this."
The tussle began Feb. 1, when the blog Search Engine Land
published details of what it called Google's "sting operation" against Bing.
Google executives claim they grew suspicious of how closely Bing's search
results mirrored their own, and, after finding terms with no matches on either
search engine, created "honey pot" pages that appeared on the top of search
results for those terms. When a small portion of Bing search results seemed to
mirror Google's forced pages, the latter began leveling accusations.
"To me, what the experiment proved was that clicks on Google
are being incorporated in Bing's rankings," Cutts wrote in his blog. "Microsoft
is best company to answer the degree to which clicks on Google figure into
their Bing's rankings, and I hope they clarify how much of an impact clicks on
Google affect Microsoft's rankings."
Microsoft claims that Bing is merely leveraging data fed by
users of Bing Bar and similar applications. "In simple terms, Google's
-experiment' was rigged to manipulate Bing search results through a type of
attack known as -click fraud,'" Yusuf Mehdi, senior vice president of
Microsoft's online services division, wrote
in a Feb. 2 posting on the Bing Community blog. "As we have said before and
again in this post, we use clickstream optionally provided by consumers in an
anonymous fashion as one of 1,000 signals to try and determine whether a site
might make sense to be in our index."
Mehdi also seemed intent on stirring the already-roiled
waters a bit more. "In October 2010, we released a series of big, noticeable
improvements to Bing's relevance. So big and noticeable that we are told Google
took notice and began to worry," he wrote. "Then, a short time later, here come
the honey-pot attacks. Is the timing purely coincidence? Are industry
discussions about search quality to be ignored? Is this simply a response to
the fact that some people in the industry are beginning to ask whether Bing is
as good or in some cases better than Google on core Web relevance?"
Bing has made slow but steady gains since its summer 2009
launch, but its 12 percent U.S. market share (as of December, according to
research firm comScore) does not present an existential threat to Google's 66.6
percent. Bing also powers back-end search for Yahoo, whose share stood at 16
percent. Even if you combine its share into Bing's, however, the audience for
Microsoft's search engine remains half that of Google.
"I don't know how old I will be when that'll happen,"
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer told an audience in March 2010, during the Search
Marketing Expo in Santa Clara, Calif., when asked if and when Bing would overtake
Google in search.
Whatever the future holds, Microsoft seems determined to
spend whatever it takes to keep Bing viable. For the quarter ended Dec. 31, the
company's Online Services Division suffered operating losses of $543 million, a
significant downtick from the $463 million burnt during the same quarter in
2009. That contributes to total losses of $1.1 billion for the second half of
Microsoft also has yet to see substantial profits from
cloud-based initiatives such as Azure. Over the next few quarters, the company
will release cloud-based products, including Office 365, designed to fit a
variety of business needs-and counter Google's aggressive push into that area
with offerings such as Google Apps.
Given Microsoft's intensifying focus on online services and
the cloud, and Google's continued presence in those areas, a little verbal
back-and-forth between the two companies' executives is only to be expected.
The vitriol of this latest salvo, though, hints at just how much both Microsoft
and Google have riding on their respective properties.
Nicholas Kolakowski is a staff editor at eWEEK, covering Microsoft and other companies in the enterprise space, as well as evolving technology such as tablet PCs. His work has appeared in The Washington Post, Playboy, WebMD, AARP the Magazine, AutoWeek, Washington City Paper, Trader Monthly, and Private Air. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.