Microsoft will be able to keep selling Microsoft Word as it appeals a high-profile patent-infringement case against small Canadian company i4i in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The original verdict ordered Microsoft to stop selling Word within 60 days, on top of paying nearly $300 million in fines to i4i, which alleged that Microsoft Words code violated its XML-related patent.Microsofts request to keep selling Microsoft Word during an increasingly
high-profile patent-infringement case has been granted by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Washington). The court issued the order, which reverses an
earlier injunction that would have stopped sale of the software by the middle of
October, on Sept. 3.
"We are happy with the result," Microsoft spokesperson Kevin Kutz told
Reuters.
The original verdict, handed down by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on Aug. 12, ordered
Redmond to pay nearly $300 million
in accumulated fines and pull from store shelves within 60 days all copies of
Microsoft Word, which allegedly violates an XML-related patent held by a small
Canadian firm, i4i. Microsofts appeal in the case will be heard by the Federal
Circuit on Sept. 23.
A full eWEEK breakdown of the patent can be found here.
Although Microsoft has wrestled with patent-infringement cases in the
past, this case has become notable for the potentially devastating effects of
the verdict if upheld. In an emergency motion filed on Aug. 18, Microsofts
legal counsel suggested that pulling Word would be devastating for both Redmond
and consumers:
"Even if Microsoft ultimately succeeds on appeal, it will never be able
to recoup the funds expended in redesigning and redistributing Word, the sales
lost during the period when Word and Office are barred from the market, and the
diminished goodwill from Microsofts many retail and industrial
customers."
In a sign of how the verdict could affect Microsoft's ecosystem, two separate companies, Dell and Hewlett-Packard, signaled their intention
to file friend-of-the-court briefs in the case. As distributors of Microsoft software, both companies faced the specter
of widespread fiscal damage should it be pulled from the shelves.
Meanwhile, the heads of i4i have publicly indicated that they intend to
pursue the case to the bitter end.
"This is a vital case for inventors and entrepreneurial companies who,
like i4i, are damaged by the willful infringement of their patents by
competitors; particularly competitors as large and powerful as Microsoft,"
Loudon Owen, chairman of i4i, said in a statement after Microsoft filed its
original appeal.
In a separate interview with eWEEK, Owen took a similarly tough position. "Where we
come from, if someone tries to take something that belongs to you, you stand up
to them; you dont just reach for the calculator," he said. "Were not in a
position to guess or second-guess or speculate as to what the court is going to
do."
Small IT companies have a history of both filing and winning
patent-infringement lawsuits filed in the
Texas court system, leading to an
uptick of such cases in recent years against IT giants such as Microsoft and
Apple.
| | Reader Comments: Microsoft Can Keep Selling Word, Says Appeals Court | | >>> Post your comment now!
| | Common SenseThis whole case is a prime example of the unfortunate effects of software patents, a wholly unnecessary procedure given that copyright provides... Posted At: 09-16-09 By: Lingo24 | | | | | | A user comment on this articleHere we go again: "Too big to let it stand or fail". Microsoft should have been broken down into several pieces long time ago. Guess who ends up... Posted At: 09-09-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | ShillsOk, now we have the postings from the shills of Microsoft and those who fear the power.
If "the patent shouldn't have been awarded" that would... Posted At: 09-09-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | A user comment on this articleWhat i4i claims to have invented existed long before. The patent never should've been granted to them in the first place. Posted At: 09-08-09 By: Anonymous | | | | | | lawyers....From everything I have read about the case, it does not seem that the Microsoft infringement, if it is upheld after all appeals, is "willful" as... Posted At: 09-07-09 By: Stratocaster | | | | | | >>> Post your comment now! | | | | | |
|
 |