Opinion: Microsoft offering indemnification to its partners shows that its encouragement of IP lawsuits, like SCO's, has come back to bite it.
Microsoft has been beating the drum for quite a while now about how much safer its intellectual property foundation is compared with scary, scary Linux
Oh, please. Even Open Source Risk Management
s Dan Ravicher, the guy who wrote up the Linux patent study showing that Linux "potentially" violated 283 software patents, thinks "Microsoft is up to its usual FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt]."
And, "Open source faces no more, if not less, legal risk than proprietary software."
Thats an especially interesting point now, since Microsoft just announced that it feels its necessary to offer IP indemnification to its larger OEMs and smaller OEM System Builder partners, as well as its OEM distributors and ISV Royalty partners.
Click here to read more about Microsofts move to protect its OEM and ISV Royalty partners from the legal costs of IP-violation lawsuits.
Could it be that, contrary to what The Yankee Group sees as an open-source indemnification nightmare
, Microsoft has woken up and realized that stirring up IP concerns has made making and selling software more costly and legally troublesome for everyone?
See what supporting SCO in its Linux lawsuit
Linux is more popular than ever, and now Microsoft and its partners have to contend with a more litigious software world as well.
No wonder Microsoft is trying to make nice with the open-source communitythe boys from Redmond now know that all software vendors are in the same hot water.
Can the open-source community trust Microsoft? Click here to read why Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols says no.
Mind you, I think its a good thing that Microsoft is offering indemnification to its partners in this environment. But I also think that its terribly ironic that Microsofts own attempts to spread FUD about open source have rebounded back at them.
I cant take too much schadenfreude from Microsofts troubles though.
The current IP environment hurts everyoneMicrosoft, Red Hat, Novell, HPeveryone. Open source, closed source, it doesnt really matter.
Dont think the buck stops with the vendors, though. It doesnt. Someone has to pay for those indemnification programs, and that someone is likely to be you, the end user, with higher list prices and additional contract charges.
eWEEK.com Senior Editor Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols has been using and writing about operating systems since the late 80s and thinks he may just have learned something about them along the way. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Check out eWEEK.coms for Microsoft and Windows news, views and analysis.