Q&A: Bill Gates wanted to make his transition away from Microsoft happen the right way at the right time. New chief research and strategy officer Craig Mundie discusses why now is the right time and how Microsoft will adapt.
On June 15, Bill Gates, Microsoft chairman and chief software architect, began handing over the reigns of power at the Redmond software maker to Craig Mundie, its new chief research and strategy officer, and Ray Ozzie, the chief software architect.
That same day, Mundie took time to talk to eWEEK senior editor Peter Galli about how long these moves have been under consideration, why this was the right time and whether the way the company does business will change significantly as Gates transitions to his foundation.
Can you give me some of the background about the thinking and planning around Bill Gates decision to step aside and hand the day-to-day running of the company to you and Ray Ozzie?
Over the course of a long time, Bill has said that he expected to transition away from Microsoft and towards the work of his foundation. Over the past few years the foundations success, in terms of both its importance and scaling, has been putting increasing pressure on Bill in his own mind to figure out a way for that to happen.
So he began that dialogue more directly with Steve Ballmer [Microsoft CEO] about two years ago. Then, about a year ago, it became a real question, not of whether he wanted to make this happen, but more of the right way to make it happen, and what would the right timing and mechanism be for that.
Click here to read more about Bill Gates decision to spend more time at his foundation.
There was a dialogue between Microsofts senior leadership and Bill and we decided the best way would be to pick an optimal transition point and then have a long and transparent transition process.
So Bill and Steve decided to pick a two-year transition period, that we would be public about and where the essential components were put in place at the beginning. The final decision that now was the right time for us to pull the trigger and make the announcement happened at the board meeting on Tuesday [June 13].
Was there any specific event, or series of events, that made this the optimal time to make the announcement?
What happened that allowed this has been the successful transition, over more than six years, from Bill to Steve as the CEO, and all the attendant structural changes that we put in place under Steves leadership to prepare for the company to scale to its current, more diverse efforts and absolute size.
That in itself has brought forward a new level of leadership in the company in terms of the division presidents and, more recently, with Kevin Turner [formerly the chief executive of Wal-Mart Stores Inc.s Sams Club warehouse stores business], coming in as chief operating officer.
We have also seen the emergence of strong technical product leaders in those divisions, like Steve Sinofsky [the senior vice president of Windows and Windows Live engineering], Bob Muglia [the senior vice president of Microsofts server and tools business] and Jay Allard [a corporate vice president and Microsofts chief XNA architect. XNA is the tools and technologies Microsoft will offer aimed at helping game developers and publishers overcome the problems they face today and in the future].
So part of what Bill used to do in time immemorial is now more directly the responsibility of those divisions.
In March, Microsoft significantly restructured its Platforms & Services Division and appointed Sinofsky to lead the Windows and Windows Live groups. Click here to read more.
Another reason why now is a good time was the arrival of Ray Ozzie through the acquisition of Groove Networks, Inc.,
because he was someone Bill had high regard for. Very soon after Ray got here, he was pushed into taking on the leadership role for our Live services strategy,
which in and of itself drew him into this company cross-coordination role.
It then became clear that Ray would be very good at doing that part of Bills role and he clearly has the stature, inside and outside the company, to take that on.
As to the innovation agenda, I have pretty much partnered with Bill on that for 13 years in terms of starting up new things within the company. I have worked with him on the research agenda, the policy agenda and the outbound engagement around those questions and so I have been a close partner with him in that space for eight years now.
So I am pretty qualified to take on ownership of that. If you think about it, all of the principle parts of Bills job are then either naturally absorbed into something we think the organization does or can be cleanly divided in a complementary split between Ray and me.
Will new personalities change how MS runs?