Whatever it's called, any pre-Longhorn OS release should separate features from security fixes.
The big question on the minds of Windows road-map watchers these days is whether Microsoft will ship a new version of its desktop operating system to fill the growing gap between Windows XP, which came out in 2001, and the ambitious "Longhorn" release, which probably wont be ready until 2007.
Read "Microsoft Mulls Interim Release, Longhorn Delayed."
You need look no further than the swollen feature set planned for XP Service Pack 2 to see that a significant new version of Windows will be upon us within the year. The real question, then, isnt whether an intermediate Windows is on its way but how Microsoft intends to market and distribute it.
Make no mistake: We wont be seeing Longhorn for a while, and thats the way it should be. The delay may disappoint developers working to create applications for Longhorn, but a rushed release wont serve anyones interests. With all the major subsystem changes planned for Longhorn, the operating system will require a very long testing period. Microsoft has bitten off quite a bit for this release, and the company needs plenty of time to chew it.
In the meantime, Microsoft should ship a new version of Windows to fill its yawning road-map void but not in the form of a bloated service pack. Were due for an update to XP on the order of what Windows 98 was to Windows 95a set of upgrades, fixes and new features that demonstrated that the Windows team had spent at least some of the three years between releases thinking about what it could and should deliver for users.
Microsoft is set to provide some of these improvements in XP Service Pack 2, but service packs are a poor way to roll out significant operating system changes. I hope that the new service pack is just that, with significant changes coming in the form of an XP upgrade.
Companies interested in obtaining the many megabytes of security fixes that have piled up since XP shipped dont want service packs stuffed with new, potentially bug-bearing featuresparticularly when many of these features are consumer-oriented (such as whatever Microsoft is planning to do to its Media Player to make it more iTunes-like). Whats more, Microsoft needs to make the companies that have paid for Software Assurancethe licensing plan that ensures free updates during its termfeel like theyre getting something for their money.
Next page: Windows XP Unbound.
As Editor in Chief of eWEEK Labs, Jason Brooks manages the Labs team and is responsible for eWEEK's print edition. Brooks joined eWEEK in 1999, and has covered wireless networking, office productivity suites, mobile devices, Windows, virtualization, and desktops and notebooks. Jason's coverage is currently focused on Linux and Unix operating systems, open-source software and licensing, cloud computing and Software as a Service. Follow Jason on Twitter at jasonbrooks, or reach him by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.