Windows 7 Early Complaints Focused on XP Mode, Drivers, Batteries (
Page 1 of 2 )
Microsoft made a huge bet that Windows 7 would not only erase the stigma
associated with Windows Vista, but also help its own flagging revenues by
impelling a massive tech refresh on the part of businesses and consumers. In
the months since the operating system’s October 2009 release, much of that bet
seems to have paid off; although business IT spending remains anemic following
a global recession, Microsoft claims that some 90 million Windows 7 licenses
have been sold.
A percentage of that success could be due to a generalized need for a tech
refresh. By the time Windows 7 hit store shelves, the
majority of the world’s PCs were using the nearly decade-old Windows XP,
and many users’ machines were aging into the realm of the truly
silicon-geriatric. But Windows 7 also contained some features, including boosted
backward compatibility with Windows XP applications and a smooth user
interface, that
managed to pull users in on their own merits. At the same time, though, and
as with any large system, problems and kinks inevitably emerged.
"Everything I've heard has been pretty positive," Roger Kay, an
analyst with Endpoint Technologies Associates, wrote in an April 21 e-mail to
eWEEK. "Of course, that's in the context of how bad Vista
was. But Windows 7 is opening the gates for an overall corporate refresh that
you could make a case is somewhat overdue."
Now
that Windows 7 has been out for a few months, and Service Pack 1 is
rumored to be in the works, eWEEK thought it worth casting an eye back to see
what sort of issues IT administrators encountered with the operating system
during its initial stage of release, and whether solutions have been devised.
Given the amount of enterprises and SMBs (small and midsize businesses)
running Windows XP, it’s perhaps no surprise that many of the IT
administrators’ complaints centered around the lack of an upgrade path between
the older operating system and Windows 7.
“Many of my associates view the lack of a direct XP to Windows 7 upgrade
path as ‘payback’ from Microsoft for customers who rejected Vista,”
Henry Cobb, engineer and director of Auburn
University’s Research Electronics
Support Facility, wrote in an e-mail to eWEEK in January. “I think that this
could be the single most important fix that Microsoft needs to address.”
At the time, Cobb and his colleagues were still evaluating Windows 7 for
deployment, and generally finding that standard Windows XP applications ported
smoothly over to the new operating system. However, Cobb also found Windows 7’s
OS footprint to be a point of minor concern.
“The ‘bloat’ of the Windows 7 OS is most likely due to the number of people
who are involved in the development of the code,” Cobb wrote. “I’m sure this is
done to speed the product out the door, but it results in code duplication as
well as marginal features.”
Complicating matters is the fact that Windows XP support is gradually
ending, with extended support for Windows XP Service Pack 3 due to end in April
2014. In a presentation a few days before the release of Windows 7, a Gartner
analyst suggested that a generalized lack of XP support from independent
software vendors (ISVs) would start around the end of 2011, creating a
nearer-term “danger zone” in XP application support by the end of 2012.
Concerned about Windows Vista’s lack of backward compatibility for older
applications and the public drubbing the company took as a result, Microsoft
built Windows
XP Mode into Windows 7, which runs applications within a virtualized
Windows XP Service Pack 3 environment. It works with Windows 7 Professional,
Ultimate and Enterprise editions,
accessible via the Windows 7 task bar by right-clicking.
Some IT administrators and business owners, however, found Windows XP Mode
to be slow to start up and run.
“I did set one machine up as virtual XP but [it] was slow and inaccurate,”
Lloyd Hudson, head of Tucson, Ariz.-based Financial Safeguards Group, wrote in
a January e-mail to eWEEK. “If possible, Windows 7 needs to be more backward
compatible.”