Windows Server, Hourly Edition

 
 
By Jason Brooks  |  Posted 2008-02-20 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Opinion: Amazon.com's EC2 provides many options for Web-based businesses.

For the past several months, anyone who's asked me about the latest big new thing in IT has gotten an earful about Amazon.com's Elastic Compute Cloud, or EC2.

You pay Amazon.com 10, 40 or 80 cents an hour (depending on the RAM, storage and CPU) and you get a virtualized server running in one of the company's data centers. It's a compelling model and one that offers all companies, but small companies in particular, a route for scaling up their Web-based businesses very quickly. EC2 also gives larger companies with their own data center capacity the option of turning to "the cloud" to handle spikes in traffic, rather than requiring these businesses to overprovision to meet occasional capacity crunches.

Right now, however, there's a big asterisk floating alongside EC2. The service, which is based on technology from the open-source Xen hypervisor project, is a Linux-only proposition. This works out just fine for businesses built on the LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP/Python/Perl) stack, but EC2 doesn't offer much to companies that rely on Windows Server applications.

While this Windows support asterisk signals a limitation of EC2, I contend that this bit of rhetorical punctuation would be best interpreted as a wake-up call to Microsoft. After all, I'm not the only one who's taken note of EC2. Red Hat has teamed with Amazon.com to make Red Hat Enterprise Linux available in Amazon.com's cloud, complete with tools to help manage mixed in-the-cloud and on-premises server deployments. While many businesses currently rely on Windows Server, I'm sure that Red Hat and other Linux platform vendors would be only too happy to help customers migrate to Linux-based, cloud-ready alternatives to companies' Windows-anchored applications.

As luck would have it, Microsoft now boasts its own virtualization platform technology, in Windows Server 2008's Hyper-V. Building out a WC2 (Windows Compute Cloud) service would give Microsoft the opportunity to demonstrate that its new hypervisor is capable of powering a major virtualized infrastructure-a sorely needed proof point for the brand-new Windows component. What's more, a WC2 platform would be a major boon to Microsoft's channel partners, particularly those selling to SMB customers for whom hosting their own on-premises servers is an unwelcome diversion from running their businesses.

Cloud computing services certainly present challenges, such as dealing with the added latency and security issues that come with entrusting machines to remote providers. To some extent, however, we're all headed cloudward for our computing, and our vendors will either lead us there, or be left scrambling to follow.

 
 
 
 
As Editor in Chief of eWEEK Labs, Jason Brooks manages the Labs team and is responsible for eWEEK's print edition. Brooks joined eWEEK in 1999, and has covered wireless networking, office productivity suites, mobile devices, Windows, virtualization, and desktops and notebooks. Jason's coverage is currently focused on Linux and Unix operating systems, open-source software and licensing, cloud computing and Software as a Service. Follow Jason on Twitter at jasonbrooks, or reach him by email at jbrooks@eweek.com.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel