Sun Microsystems CEO Jonathan Schwartz said he is a huge fan of open source and of lowering the barriers to entry for developers and customers across the world.
He also believes that position does not contrast with where the Santa Clara, Calif., company is headed with Java.
"We have open-sourced the server with Glass Fish and we have made the code available on the desktop, it has just not been under and OSI (Open Source Initiative)-approved license. But the code has been available and we have been accepting community contributions for a while now," he said.
"My personal belief is that we need to continue to invest in the community and in the licenses and conventions that are well accepted by the community. In so doing, we will grow the market and the value of the Java platform. This will in no way diminish it," he said.
Asked if Sun felt having an OSI-approved license for its products was important, Schwartz said the fact that those licenses were important to developers made it important to Sun. If Sun went down the path of open-source licensing Java, it would use an OSI-approved license, he added.
"I am a big fan of the GPL and have been for a long while, but I also believe that some licensees want the ability to separate their own intellectual property.
The CDDL (Common Development and Distribution License) is open to every other license while the GPL (GNU General Public License) is not. One is not better than the other, they just appeal to different audiences," Schwartz said.
He pointed to the momentum around OpenSolaris over the past 12 months as a case in point, with Sun distributing nearly 5 million licenses for the operating system over that time. This was the largest single year for operating system deployments in Suns 20-plus year history, he said.
"The revenue associated with Solaris has also risen dramatically because of this, so the two are not in conflict," Schwartz said.
Many of the calls for Sun to open Java from people in the open-source community were attempts to drive some controversy and get some attention for a company or an individual.
These claims were countered by as many calls from the other side saying that Sun should never offer Java under the GPL (GNU General Public License) and should never open-source it so as to prevent the tipping effect that has happened with other open-source activities.