AT&T, DirecTV Merger Hearings Underway at the House, Senate

By Michelle Maisto  |  Posted 2014-06-24 Print this article Print
AT&T DirecTV merger

Bergmayer pointed out that when AT&T introduced Project VIP in 2012, it promised to provide broadband service to 57 million customer locations and wireless broadband to 19 million additional customer locations.

"That's a plan to serve 76 million customer locations with a broadband product—6 million more than it is promising to serve after [the DirecTV] deal," said Bergmayer. "A commitment to serve 70 million customers with broadband cannot count as a merger-specific public interest benefit when AT&T already plans to serve 76 million."

He also pointed out that AT&T plans to offer fixed wireless service—what it's calling wireless local loop, or WLL—and that 85 percent of WLL locations are said to be outside of AT&T's wireline footprint.

"Policymakers should ask whatever became of AT&T's 2006 commitment to serve 100 percent of the population in its footprint with broadband (wired and wireless)," Bergmayer said in his testimony. "Why have these customers gone without AT&T broadband for so long, and why should we think that promises in this merger will turn out any different than past unmet merger promises?"

A Need for Review

The ACA's Lieberman described his industry as being in the midst of "considerable consolidation" that will have "major ramifications for consumers and competition."

Lieberman said that regulators and authorities at all levels need to analyze pending deals and address "harms they create, either through divestitures and behavioral remedies or outright denial."

Moreover, he continued, "Congress should review existing rules and regulations to ensure that industrywide problems are addressed so the new market order does not harm consumers by hindering the ability of firms other than the merging parties to compete effectively."

An AT&T/DirecTV merger will also increase the incentive of DirecTV-affiliated programmers to charge higher prices to their rivals, which include hundreds of small and medium-sized multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs), said Lieberman.

These smaller MVPDs—which provide "triple play" bundles of video, broadband Internet and voice services, and compete against big companies like Comcast, DirecTV, Dish, TWC, AT&T, Verizon and Charter—are the ACA's members.

AT&T has nearly 6 million TV subscribers, TWC has 11 million, Dish has 14 million and Comcast has 22 million. DirecTV, with its 20 million subscribers, might pay 20 percent less for content than AT&T does currently, said Lieberman. A merger, he explained, would solve AT&T's programming costs issue, but leave smaller MVPDs in the pinch. Between 2008 and 2013, 1,078 small and rural cable systems were closed.

"Given the rise in programming costs, we are likely to see even more system closing in the coming years. Moreover, we're also likely to see more small cable systems controlling costs by dropping programming, particularly independent programming," said Lieberman.

Sports programming has become particularly out of the reach of smaller MVPDs; notably, the details of the merger allow AT&T to walk away from the deal if DirecTV fails to secure the rights to the NFL's "Sunday Ticket" programming.

Likely to Happen

While AT&T may be playing up a new commitment to rural consumers that can start some eyes rolling, it's also committing to spending serious money.

"That's real money they're going to be putting behind that effort, and that means jobs and economic activity that wouldn't otherwise have happened, or happened in the same time frame ... so there's strong incentive for the government to say yes to the promises that AT&T is making," Technology Business Research Senior Analyst Chris Antlitz told eWEEK.

"When AT&T says they'll get synergies and cost savings, they're right. The question is, will the cost savings get passed on to consumers or go into AT&T's coffers? Probably both," Antlitz continued. "They need to provide a good offering to the consumer, or [regulators] aren't going to buy it."

That said, Antlitz estimates that there's a "more than 50 percent chance" that the deal will be approved.

"The key thing to understand here is they're going to be able to offer a very different thing across the country," said Antlitz. "This is going to help AT&T transform itself into a leading, end-to-end provider of video services, rather than a dumb Internet pipe."

What that means, too, is that other carriers will want to do the same thing by teaming up with a DirecTV equivalent: Dish Network.

"Something's going to happen to Dish. The question is who, and when and how much," said Antlitz. Given how stretched budgets are (Verizon's Vodafone deal, for example, exhausted a good chunk of resources), such a deal may not come about through a merger.

With "not a lot of money floating around," said Antlitz, "I think there's a good possibility for a unique partnership."


Follow Michelle Maisto on Twitter.


Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters

Rocket Fuel