Both proposals offer shareholders more money than the one from Michael Dell and Silver Lake, setting up a potential bidding war for the PC maker.
Michael Dell’s efforts to take his namesake company private are quickly turning into a bidding war for the world’s third-largest PC maker.
and Icahn Enterprises
—run by activist investor Carl Icahn—have made separate bids
for Dell that the special committee created by the tech vendor’s board of directors to oversee the process said could prove better than the $13.65-per-share price offered by Michael Dell and investment firm Silver Lake Partners.
News of the competing bids came as the March 22 deadline passed for the “go-shop” period, which was laid out in Feb. 5 proposal from Michael Dell and Silver Lake Partners. The go-shop period enabled the board’s special committee to seek competing offers and to negotiate with interested parties after March 22.
Now there are two other bidders for Dell, and committee members said in a statement that “both proposals could reasonably be expected to result in superior proposals” to the $24.4 billion deal laid out by Michael Dell and his partners.
“We are gratified by the success of our go-shop process that has yielded two alternative proposals with the potential to create additional value for Dell shareholders,” Alex Mandl, chairman of the special committee, said in a statement
. “We intend to work diligently with all three potential acquirers to ensure the best possible outcome for Dell shareholders, whichever transaction that may be.”
Should the winning bid come from either Blackstone or Icahn, it could mean the end of Michael Dell’s tenure at the company he founded more than two decades ago in his dorm room at the University of Texas.
Blackstone’s bid would give shareholders the chance to receive either stock or cash at a price of more than $14.25 a share, and the shares would continue to be traded publicly on the Nasdaq.
“We believe there is significant upside in the Dell businesses, we see significant upside in the value of Dell’s shares,” Blackstone officials said in an open letter to Dell’s special committee
In a statement released March 25
, Icahn officials said their proposal also would let shareholders continue to hold Dell stock if they want, or to sell their Dell stock at $15 per share. Like their Blackstone counterparts, Icahn officials said they believe the “future for Dell is bright.”
A bidding war is far from the scenario Michael Dell likely envisioned when he and Silver Lake Partners put in their $24.4 billion leveraged buyout bid
for the embattled tech vendor, which is undergoing a difficult transformation from being a maker of commodity PCs to being a vendor of enterprise IT solutions, from servers, storage products and networking gear to software and services. Dell has spent billions of dollars buying companies as it looks to build up its capabilities.
However, the company’s revenues are still closely tied to a worldwide PC market that continues to see declines in sales as consumers and businesses spend more of their technology dollars on mobile devices like tablets and smartphones. According to IDC analysts, in the fourth quarter of 2012, PC shipments fell 6.4 percent
compared with the same period in 2011, despite the recent release of Microsoft’s Windows 8 operating system.
Buying Dell and taking it private
would enable Michael Dell and other company executives to accelerate their efforts to transform the vendor
and reduce its reliance on PCs, and to do so away from the Wall Street spotlight, according to analysts. In the buyout proposal, Michael Dell would retain control of Dell.
However, the proposal has been the target of criticism since it was first made. There has been considerable shareholder pushback
, including by the three large investors—Southeastern Asset Management, T. Rowe Price and Icahn—who said the bid vastly undervalued Dell and was designed to benefit Michael Dell more than shareholders. All had said they would vote against the plan, with Southeastern officials—who are pushing for a price of more than $20 per share—saying they would consider a proxy challenge to keep it from happening.