When Is VaporWare Not VaporWare? Hardly Ever
There were many thought-leaders in vaporware production, but Microsoft was always my favorite. When it announced nothing, it was really nothing.
Oracle and SAP are giving that time-honored custom new spit-and-polish with strategic acquisitions in retail. The acquisitions are certainly real and the capabilities of the acquired software specialists are also quite real.
But the essence of both vendors announcements has been the argument that the combined whole will be greater than the sum of the parts. This is usually backed up with the logic that huge investments are imminent from the new wealthy corporate parent and that the good software specialist from before will now blossom into a great technology powerhouse.
Unfortunately, history does not look kindly on such promises. In the worst examples, the corporate parent imposes its own culture and views on the purchased specialty app and kills the value that customers saw. In the best examples, the corporate parent changes little, which invariably forces the question of what the customers gained.
This weeks examples from SAP and Oracle illustrate two different aspects of what had been the "now you see it, now you dont" marketing illusion and is now the "now you dont see it and theres a really good chance you never will" illusion.
On Tuesday, Oracle will announce the creation of Oracle Retail, which Oracle will say is "a new brand that brings together the best retail expertise and technology of Oracle and the former Retek and ProfitLogic companies."
That already existed. It was called Oracle and it happened the moment Larry Ellisons team announced both deals. The statement Oracle has prepared goes on to list lots of capabilities and combined customers, but nothing there is new. Its literally things they could have saidand, for the most part, did saywhen the deals happened.
They could at least have had the courtesy to make up some new name for the brand. The Cyclone, the Cobra, the Ellisonater or something.
Their problem is real. They have to convince retailers to stay put while the bigger Oracle integrationwhen the recent large PeopleSoft acquisition is factored in and the older J.D. Edwards acquisition is smoothed out as wellhappens under the name Fusion. (SAPs nicknaming the strategy Confusion is one of the better SAPisms from recent months.)
But in the POTS-calling-the-analog phone-black example is SAPs response on Monday, when it announced its own excellent acquisition, that of Toronto retail software specialty firm Triversity.
Jim McMurray, the SAP America SVP for the retail business unit, rattled off three functionality areas (Java-based J2EE, analytics/loss prevention and client/server POS) where he argued the SAP-Triversity combo did better than the Oracle-Retek-ProfitLogic combo.
Fair enough. But he then said that for retailers who liked the combo, "You dont have to wait. Theres no need for integration with Project Fusion."
The only problem was that, less than an hour after he said that, Dave Thomas, the articulate and impressive CEO of Triversity, was talking about how much further than those advantages the SAP-Triversity deal potentially goes.
The POS, he says, has become lightyears more than just a faster more computerized version of an electronic cash register. Its now the heart of almost everything that is strategic in retail IT operations.
Those things include loyalty, CRM, loss prevention, centralized returns, gift cards and even Web integration/multi-channel activities all falling under into the POS jurisdiction.
"There are quite a few new solutions through the combination, with complex order management driving that right down to the store level," Thomas said. "Were bringing multi-channel CRM into the retail store space. SAP didnt buy Triversity for POS only. Its much more broader and more elaborate than that."
But he said those things wont happen until SAP and Triversity (and whoever else SAP gobbles up in the meantime) work out a timeline.
So SAPs promise that its users wont have to wait rings hollow. Of course users will have to wait. At least SAPs newest exectutiveThomascan articulate a strategic vision about why these pieces should work together and why the SAP whole may indeed be greater than the sum of the parts.
But its just a vision. A well-thought persuasive vision, yes, but simply one view of how things might be. Retail CIOs need to make multi-year decisions about where they need to position their companies and they cant wait for roadmaps to be finalized.
The wisest course of action seems to be for retail CIOs to assume that the roadmaps will never happen and make their decisions based on the core software (Oracle or SAP, in this case) and hope that the other pieces will fall into place.
I dont mind when vendors tout that their product line strategy is better than another vendors. But when Oracle puts a pretty bow on old announcements and wants us to think its something new or when SAP announces an acquisition and wants us to assume that a combined product line is instantaneous, it certainly makes me long for the good old vaporware days. At least then you knew what you had: nothing.
Evan Schuman is retail editor for Ziff Davis Internets Enterprise Edit group. He has tracked high-tech issues since 1987, has been opinionated long before that and doesnt plan to stop anytime soon. He can be reached at Evan_Schuman@ziffdavis.com.
Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, views and analysis on technologys impact on retail.