AT&T's Purchase of T-Mobile Collapses; Let the Finger-Pointing Begin

P. J. Connolly began writing for IT publications in 1997 and has a lengthy track record in both news and reviews. Since then, he's built two test labs from scratch and earned a reputation as the nicest skeptic you'll ever meet. Before taking up journalism, P. J. was an IT manager and consultant in San Francisco with a knack for networking the Apple Macintosh, and his love for technology is exceeded only by his contempt for the flavor of the month. Speaking of which, you can follow P. J. on Twitter at pjc415, or drop him an email at
By P. J. Connolly  |  Posted 2011-12-20 Email Print this article Print

There will be some unhappy people this Christmas now that the acquisition of T-Mobile from AT&T is off the table. But I won't be one of them, and I can say with a straight face that it has nothing at all to do with my crush on The Girl in the Pink Dress.


With the collapse of AT&T's plan to acquire T-Mobile, Princess Carly dodges the Death Star, but what sort of future awaits T-Mobile?

Nor is my lack of concern driven by the technological mismatch between the two GSM carriers. I may never understand why T-Mobile chose to use the 1700MHz band when the rest of the GSM-speaking world had placed itself squarely on 850, 900, 1900 and 2100MHz, but I know that in doing so, the carrier shot itself in the foot and kept pulling the trigger.

No, I just didn't see what was in this for anyone except shareholders and executives of the two companies. For the rest of us, it looked like another set of phony promises of efficiencies and synergies, and finally, after years of toothless "regulation," someone in a position of power - in this case, the combination of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission - called shenanigans on the whole mess.

There's no question that Deutsche Telekom's bid to make big money in the American market has failed miserably, except in the area of corporate iconography. After all, you know you've succeeded when the competition's ads mock your campaign, and TGITPD - her real name is Carly Foulkes - is inarguably an emblem of whatever we wind up calling this era. (I'm voting for "20-Tweens" until I hear something better.) In any event, the collapse of this deal leaves T-Mobile without foreseeable options; the other major wireless carriers are even less technologically compatible than AT&T was.

Meanwhile, shareholders of AT&T are presumably less than amused by the $1.5 billion dollar payment - that seems to be the net, after taxes - which the company will have to make to Deutsche Telekom as compensation for the collapse of the deal. I wouldn't be counting on much in the way of dividend checks next year, if I were one of you.

Ultimately, I want to see a rebuke from Justice - and/or the FCC - aimed squarely at statements such as those of AT&T chairman and CEO Randall Stephenson, in which he displays the conceit that the most important responsibility of the Federal government is to make sure that AT&T gets as much of the wireless spectrum as it deems necessary. Newsflash for Mr. Stephenson and his ilk: that isn't your spectrum, bub. That belongs to We, the People; we're just letting you rent it for a minute or two. |

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...

Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters

Rocket Fuel