Is Apple's 'Leopard' Really 'Vista 2.0'?

 
 
By Mary Jo  |  Posted 2006-08-07 Email Print this article Print
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

We like a good Windows Vista dig as much as anyone. But is Apple CEO Steve Jobs really justified in calling Mac OS X 10.5 (a k a "Leopard") the equivalent of Vista 2.0? Can't the 64-bit versions of Vista fully support 64-bit applications? And isn't Apple's TimeMachine feature the same as Windows Volume Shadow Copy? We admit we are no Apple experts here at Microsoft Watch. But is Leopard really the Mac OS X release that should bid Vista "hasta la vista"?

<< Back to home

 
 
 
 
del.icio.us | digg.com
 
 
 
 
 
 

Submit a Comment

Loading Comments...
 
 
Manage your Newsletters: Login   Register My Newsletters























 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rocket Fuel