IBM Cries Foul Over WebSphere Usability Study | eWeek

IBM Cries Foul Over WebSphere Usability Study

Verfasst von
Darryl K. Taft
Darryl K. Taft
Nov 1, 2004
2 minute read
eWeek Inhalte und Produktempfehlungen sind redaktionell unabhängig. Wir können Geld verdienen, wenn Sie auf Links zu unseren Partnern klicken. Mehr erfahren

As IT managers and developers work to deploy enterprise applications and Web services, IBM and Microsoft Corp. are sniping over platform supremacy studies.

IBM last week fired back at a Microsoft-commissioned report by The Middleware Company Inc., which alleged that .Net provides more developer productivity than IBMs WebSphere and J2EE (Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition).

/zimages/2/28571.gifIBM recently updated Websphere.Click hereto read more.

In a document titled “IBM Response to the study entitled Comparing Microsoft .NET and IBM WebSphere/J2EE by The Middleware Company” and viewed by eWEEK, IBM attacks the TMC report as “another flawed study.”

The TMC study, released last month, said it took 195 developer-hours to build some enterprise applications, compared with 94 developer-hours to build the same applications with Microsofts Visual Studio. Application server installation and configuration took 22 developer-hours in the WebSphere environment and 4 in the Microsoft environment, the study said.

IBM, of Armonk, N.Y., rebutted the claims as biased based on the level of experience of the .Net developers used in the study and the relative lower level of experience of the WebSphere developers. “One of the largest faults of the study is the focus on Rational Rapid Developer (RRD) as the primary J2EE development tool from IBM,” the IBM document said. “IBM has never marketed RRD as a full-blown WebSphere toolset with all the functionality of WebSphere Studio Application Developer (WSAD). WSAD is the tool intended specifically for building integrated enterprise J2EE applications.”

Tyler Jewell, CEO of TMC, in Mountain View, Calif., defended the tests and called into question the validity of IBMs claims. “It seems like the document—unbranded and no author identified—was hastily compiled and authored from someone who didnt read our report completely,” said Jewell.

IBM would not comment on the document or verify its authorship, although officials did not deny it came from IBM.

“The Middleware Company is a consultancy of J2EE experts, and I have no discomfort with their building the J2EE implementation for the study,” said Andrew Brust, chief of new technology at Citigate Hudson, in New York.

/zimages/2/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms Enterprise Applications Center for the latest news, reviews and analysis about productivity and business solutions.

/zimages/2/77042.gif

Be sure to add our eWEEK.com enterprise applications news feed to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo page

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Eigentum von TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Alle Rechte vorbehalten

Werbetreibenden-Offenlegung: Einige der auf dieser Website erscheinenden Produkte stammen von Unternehmen, von denen TechnologyAdvice eine Vergütung erhält. Diese Vergütung kann beeinflussen, wie und wo Produkte auf dieser Website erscheinen, einschließlich beispielsweise der Reihenfolge, in der sie erscheinen. TechnologyAdvice schließt nicht alle Unternehmen oder alle auf dem Marktplatz verfügbaren Produkttypen ein.