ICANN | eWeek

ICANN

Verfasst von
eWEEK EDITORS
eWEEK EDITORS
Sep 3, 2001
1 minute read
eWeek Inhalte und Produktempfehlungen sind redaktionell unabhängig. Wir können Geld verdienen, wenn Sie auf Links zu unseren Partnern klicken. Mehr erfahren

To best understand how bumbling bureaucracies are born, you need look no farther than the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, that band of merry pranksters who administer top-level domains. Decisions made in a vacuum, zero oversight, a tin ear to constituents and a blithe disregard for its own public image — its all there in a single marvelous microcosm. ICANN wins a 2001 Razzie for its uncanny ability to create and perpetuate controversy, even while dealing with one of the most arcane subjects in creation. Late last year, it earned extra points for finally picking new global TLDs in a way that raised blood pressures around the planet. Forty-four groups paid ICANN $50,000 a pop to suggest new names. But only seven name applications were ultimately chosen in a process that was arbitrary at best — one name, dot-iii, was rejected, in part, because it sounded funny. Also razworthy: ICANN still hasnt delivered on its promise to fill four empty seats on its board with general Internet users.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Eigentum von TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Alle Rechte vorbehalten

Werbetreibenden-Offenlegung: Einige der auf dieser Website erscheinenden Produkte stammen von Unternehmen, von denen TechnologyAdvice eine Vergütung erhält. Diese Vergütung kann beeinflussen, wie und wo Produkte auf dieser Website erscheinen, einschließlich beispielsweise der Reihenfolge, in der sie erscheinen. TechnologyAdvice schließt nicht alle Unternehmen oder alle auf dem Marktplatz verfügbaren Produkttypen ein.