Anti-Spam Tools: Can They Keep Up? | eWeek

Anti-Spam Tools: Can They Keep Up?

Verfasst von
Neil J. Rubenking
Neil J. Rubenking
Jul 9, 2004
2 minute read
eWeek Inhalte und Produktempfehlungen sind redaktionell unabhängig. Wir können Geld verdienen, wenn Sie auf Links zu unseren Partnern klicken. Mehr erfahren

The deluge of spam just keeps increasing, and spammers are getting sneakier every day. That means anti-spam products have to get tougher to stay ahead of the game. So we tested the latest versions of five spam blockers to see if they can hold back the flood.

We configured each product according to the vendors advice for minimizing the amount of legitimate mail misfiled in the spam folder (false positives) while still keeping the most spam out of our in-box (false negatives). Where there was a choice, we tested with Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express, based on the vendors recommendation.

Four of the five products we reviewed use filtering techniques—analyzing message content and headers—to identify spam. To test those, we diverted a stream of spam-infested, real-world messages to multiple e-mail accounts, each protected by one of the products. For comparison, we ran the same e-mail stream through Outlooks own spam filter and through Cloudmark SpamNet and Aladdins Spam Catcher, both of which did well in our last roundup. We intended to compare Norton AntiSpam 2004, our Editors Choice in that roundup, as well, but a glitch in the product (which has since been fixed) during our testing period prevented the necessary unattended mail processing.

For 10 days, we manually trained the products, correcting any legitimate mail that was misfiled as spam or vice versa. Then we cleared the in-boxes and configured the programs to use only filtering to identify spam—not whitelists, blacklists, or challenge/response systems. We let them run for 10 more days and then exported each products mailbox using askSam 6. We identified the messages that were received by all of the products and discarded the rest. Next, we manually identified the remaining messages as undeniably spam or undeniably valid, deleting all others. The results, shown in the accompanying table, reflect only the products ability to filter spam. When whitelisting, blacklisting, and challenge/response (if available) are enabled, accuracy will naturally improve.

Click here for the full story at PCMag.com.

Check out eWEEK.coms Security Center at http://security.eweek.com for the latest security news, reviews and analysis.

Be sure to add our eWEEK.com developer and Web services news feed to your RSS newsreader or My Yahoo page

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Eigentum von TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Alle Rechte vorbehalten

Werbetreibenden-Offenlegung: Einige der auf dieser Website erscheinenden Produkte stammen von Unternehmen, von denen TechnologyAdvice eine Vergütung erhält. Diese Vergütung kann beeinflussen, wie und wo Produkte auf dieser Website erscheinen, einschließlich beispielsweise der Reihenfolge, in der sie erscheinen. TechnologyAdvice schließt nicht alle Unternehmen oder alle auf dem Marktplatz verfügbaren Produkttypen ein.