Software Securitys Rating Game

Écrit par
Ryan Naraine
Ryan Naraine
Published: Feb 13, 2006
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek Le contenu et les recommandations de produits sont indépendants de la rédaction. Nous pouvons gagner de l'argent lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers nos partenaires. En savoir plus

Exactly one year after the introduction of the Common Vulnerability Scoring System as a vendor-neutral standard to get around the confusion of measuring the severity of security flaws, the ambitious initiative appears stalled by the indifference of some of its own heavyweight backers.

The standard, which was unveiled at last years RSA Conference, has largely been ignored by several of the same software vendors that introduced it—including Microsoft, Oracle, Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems and Symantec. CVSS, which uses strict mathematical calculations to determine the seriousness of software security holes, could provide companies with quantitative data to prioritize security flaws and allocate time and labor accordingly.

But, instead of rallying behind the standard, vendors have largely ignored the security scoring system, putting a damper on expectations that CVSS will replace the wide range of vendor-specific rating systems. As a result, companies still have to rely on a hodgepodge of security rating systems.

Microsoft, with its operating system market dominance, is seen as the elephant in the room, but theres no urgency at the software maker to switch from its proprietary flaw rating system that describes vulnerabilities as “critical,” “important,” “moderate” or “low.”

Gavin Reid, project leader of the Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams, the nonprofit tasked with managing the CVSS initiative, remains encouraged by the handful of companies that have started adding CVSS scores to security alerts.

“It would be nice to have Microsoft and all the other big vendors on board, but I dont think the success of CVSS is dependent on them,” Reid said in Research Triangle Park, N.C. “If IT departments find the scoring system valuable to prioritize patching, it doesnt matter whos doing it.”

In the past year, CVSS scores have started appearing in advisories from companies such as Cisco Systems, Qualys, Nessus and Skype. In addition, in what amounts to the biggest endorsement for CVSS, the National Institute of Standards and Technologys National Vulnerability Database has completed CVSS scores for more than 15,000 vulnerabilities in its system.

“I dont agree that CVSS adoption has languished at all,” said Gerhard Eschelbeck, a security researcher who helped invent the CVSS standard and senior vice president and chief technology officer at Webroot Software, in Boulder, Colo. “Im not surprised we havent conquered the world in one year. But theres a lot of momentum to keep us excited.”

Advertisement

Microsoft officials declined to be interviewed for this story. Instead, the Redmond, Wash., company sent a carefully worded statement to eWEEK.

“Microsoft is continually working with their customers to gather their feedback on how to make the process better and more valuable to them and will evaluate that feedback and make changes that best meet the needs of their customers,” the statement said.

Ryan Naraine

Ryan Naraine is a ServerWatch, eSecurity Planet, and eWEEK contributor.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Propriété de TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Tous droits réservés

Divulgation publicitaire : Certains des produits qui apparaissent sur ce site proviennent d'entreprises dont TechnologyAdvice reçoit une compensation. Cette compensation peut influencer la façon dont les produits apparaissent sur ce site, notamment l'ordre dans lequel ils apparaissent. TechnologyAdvice n'inclut pas toutes les entreprises ou tous les types de produits disponibles sur le marché.