OSDL Answers Microsoft Claims

Écrit par
Peter Galli
Peter Galli
Published: Feb 13, 2006
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek Le contenu et les recommandations de produits sont indépendants de la rédaction. Nous pouvons gagner de l'argent lorsque vous cliquez sur des liens vers nos partenaires. En savoir plus

Open source development labs is striking back at Microsoft and its Get the Facts research strategy with a 17-page report titled “Get the Truth on Linux Management” that challenges Microsofts claims that Linux has a higher total cost of ownership and higher system management costs than Windows.

Andi Mann, an analyst at Enterprise Management Associates, in Boulder, Colo., who conducted the research and wrote the report, told eWEEK in an interview that the studys overall conclusion is that Linux may, in many cases, be substantially less expensive to own than Windows.

“In various older studies, Microsoft and some analysts had claimed that Linux had a higher TCO than Windows, and they attributed the difference mainly to higher system management costs, concluding that the higher TCO outweighed the much lower license and acquisition costs for Linux,” Mann said.

However, the EMA study found this perception is no longer accurate. With far lower acquisition costs, Linux is now a cost-effective alternative to Windows, Mann said.

The study, which was conducted between last fall and the start of this winter and will be released this week, was sponsored by Levanta, a company that focuses on Linux management and data virtualization, and OSDL.

Among the key findings were that Linux tends to be more productive, as Linux administrators often manage more servers than Windows administrators, and that Linux systems tend to handle greater workloads than Windows systems.

Three-quarters of Linux administrators surveyed said they can provision a system in less than an hour using sophisticated tools, while one-third can provision a system in less than 30 minutes.

Martin Taylor, general manager of platform strategy at Microsoft, of Redmond, Wash., told eWEEK that he is “excited to see the OSDL join Microsoft in working to deliver insights and facts we know customers need to help inform their IT decisions.”

EMAs primary research involved a random sampling of several thousand IT organizations by telephone, as well as more than 100 selected Web respondents. Supplementing this research were in-depth interviews with 13 selected CIOs and IT managers.

Peter Galli

Peter Galli has been a technology reporter for 12 years at leading publications in South Africa, the UK and the US. He has comprehensively covered Microsoft and its Windows and .Net platforms, as well as the many legal challenges it has faced. He has also focused on Sun Microsystems and its Solaris operating environment, Java and Unix offerings. He covers developments in the open source community, particularly around the Linux kernel and the effects it will have on the enterprise. He has written extensively about new products for the Linux and Unix platforms, the development of open standards and critically looked at the potential Linux has to offer an alternative operating system and platform to Windows, .Net and Unix-based solutions like Solaris.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Propriété de TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Tous droits réservés

Divulgation publicitaire : Certains des produits qui apparaissent sur ce site proviennent d'entreprises dont TechnologyAdvice reçoit une compensation. Cette compensation peut influencer la façon dont les produits apparaissent sur ce site, notamment l'ordre dans lequel ils apparaissent. TechnologyAdvice n'inclut pas toutes les entreprises ou tous les types de produits disponibles sur le marché.