So Long, Transmeta

執筆者
Jeff Burt
Jeff Burt
Published: Sep 25, 2008
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

So Transmeta is up for sale, a move reported by eWEEK’s Scott Ferguson and one that will mark the end of an innovative processor company that turned its attention to battery life and energy consumption several years before “green IT” became a popular industry phrase. The move can’t be considered unexpected, and it won’t create much of a ripple through the industry. That said, Transmeta’s passing deserves attention.

For the most part, not much has been heard from the company since it announced in 2005 that it was stopping production of its Crusoe and Efficeon chips in favor of gaining revenue through licensing its intellectual property, particularly its LongRun and LongRun2 technology, which let users dynamically manage such aspects as frequency and voltage.

Up to that point, Transmeta officials had spent millions developing energy-efficient chips to meet the growing demand in the mobile computing space, and later the embedded market. However, the company was never able to gain much traction in the market, as evidenced by the millions of dollars it was losing on a quarterly basis by the time of its 2005 decision. But the company did make enough noise to fuel the discussion around energy efficiency and spur Intel to start addressing the issue of power consumption.

Transmeta was an interesting company that offered innovative technology. For a reporter, it was also a strange company to cover at times. Even as it tried to carve a space for itself in the highly competitive processor space, its executives played all its cards close to the vest. They were all pretty smart dudes, but they would say very little during briefings, even those interviews that they had initiated, and at times would decline to comment on wider industry trends, despite the urgings of frustrated PR folks to open up a bit. The executives acted as though Transmeta was Intel, rather than a small company desperately chasing Intel. That probably wouldn’t have changed the eventual outcome, but it probably didn’t help them at the time. Name recognition never came easily for Transmeta, though it did have some success overseas.

Still, as I’ve said about AMD in the past, competition has always been good for Intel, and Transmeta was no different. The company hit on a growing issue in an industry that was beginning to see rapid growth in mobile computing, and Intel smartly took notice. That was inevitable, and eventually spelled doom for the little company.

So goodbye, Transmeta. You gave it a good shot. It was good having you around, however briefly.

Jeff Burt

Jeffrey Burt has been with eWEEK since 2000, covering an array of areas that includes servers, networking, PCs, processors, converged infrastructure, unified communications and the Internet of things.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。