Tech Vendors, Cyber-Spying and the Law

Published: Dec 18, 2013
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
Tech Vendors, Cyber-Spying and the Law
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Since June, the world has been learning, leak by pilfered document leak, the extent of the U.S. government’s cyber-spying operations. National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden stole countless numbers of documents that have had the effect of also reducing confidence in U.S. technology vendors as they try and do business abroad.

The tech vendors aren’t happy, and they’ve brought their message to President Barack Obama.

“This was an opportunity for the president to hear from CEOs directly as we near completion of our review of signals intelligence programs, building on the feedback we’ve received from the private sector in recent weeks and months,” the White House said in a statement. “The President made clear his belief in an open, free, and innovative Internet and listened to the group’s concerns and recommendations, and made clear that we will consider their input as well as the input of other outside stakeholders as we finalize our review of signals intelligence programs.”

According to multiple reports including one in the The Washington Post about the non-public comments made during the meeting, tech vendors told President Obama that they are losing business because of the spying allegations.

That revelation should not come as a complete surprise, as none other than Cisco CEO John Chambers publicly said during his company’s first-quarter fiscal 2014 earnings call that the NSA disclosures were having an impact.

“I think, if you look at it, it is an impact in China. I think we’re all aware of that,” Chambers said at the time. “I think it’s impacting on the total emerging country business, however, is fairly nominal.”

When I’ve spoken to multiple U.S. cloud vendors in recent months about the business risks associated with the NSA disclosures, the response has always been somewhat muted, with vendors recognizing there is an impact but unwilling to definitively say they’re hurting. Apparently, they’re willing to tell Obama about the effects on their companies, and in a year when the economy is standing on the precipice of recovery or a return to recession, this is an issue that cannot fall on deaf ears.

Advertisement

Adding to the clamor for surveillance reform is the Dec. 16 U.S. District Court ruling that found that the NSA’s efforts might well be unconstitutional.

To be clear, it is my strong personal view that the NSA has a pivotal role to play in defending U.S. national interests against attack, and the Internet should never be a safe haven for terrorists. The NSA should have legal tools available to it so that it can achieve its mission and keep us all safe. That said, it’s now clear that the broad surveillance activities undertaken undermine U.S. tech vendor interests, and as such, something must change.

Sean Michael Kerner is a senior editor at eWEEK and InternetNews.com. Follow him on Twitter @TechJournalist.

Sean Michael Kerner

Sean Michael Kerner is an Internet consultant, strategist, and writer for several leading IT business web sites.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。