Aliens IPO Documents Shed Perhaps Too Much RFID Light

執筆者
Evan Schuman
Evan Schuman
Published: Jun 15, 2006
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Few companies have come to represent the RFID space—warts and all—so clearly as has Alien Technology. So when the company announced plans to seek an IPO, it was Wall Streets first big shot at evaluating the RFID market.

Aliens S-1 SEC filing delivers few surprises beyond the required candid lawsuit-avoiding language so popular in SEC filings. Still, Alien statements such as “Both we and other industry participants have overestimated RFID market size and overall growth rates” are noteworthy. Is Aliens IPO a test of the whole RFID market?

What the IPO makes clear is that Alien has never been profitable. “We incurred net losses of $19.1 million, $27.6 million and $53.0 million in fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, respectively, and $17.9 million in the three months ended December 31, 2005,” the statement said. “Net loss allocable to common stockholders was $44.5 million, $27.6 million and $53.0 million in fiscal 2003, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2005, respectively. As of December 31, 2005, we had an accumulated deficit of $201.2 million.”

Thats fine, but no one really believed that a pureplay RFID player would be a cash cow in 2005. But Aliens own executives had overestimated RFID market size and growth rates.

Then comes the kicker: “To date, we have had limited success in accurately predicting future sales of our RFID products generally and our RFID tag products in particular. We expect that our visibility into future sales of our products, including both sales volumes and prices, will continue to be limited for the foreseeable future.”

Is that like my saying that Ive had limited success in making billions of dollars as the worlds ugliest male model? That is suddenly my favorite new phrase. When my wife asks me if Ive finished cleaning the kitchen, Ill tell her that Im enjoying limited success in that endeavor.

Comments that were e-mailed around from analyst firm VDC were on target. “While publishing these statements are understandable from a risk perspective, they unfortunately do not bolster the confidence of would-be investors,” a VDC E-mail said.

Retail Center Editor Evan Schuman can be reached at Evan_Schuman@ziffdavis.com.

Advertisement

Check out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, views and analysis on technologys impact on retail.

Evan Schuman

Evan Schuman

Content Writer

Evan Schuman is the editor of CIOInsight.com's Retail industry center. He has covered retail technology issues since 1988 for Ziff-Davis, CMP Media, IDG, Penton, Lebhar-Friedman, VNU, BusinessWeek, Business 2.0 and United Press International, among others.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。