Weak Speech Recognition Leaves Customers Cold

執筆者
eWEEK EDITORS
eWEEK EDITORS
Published: Dec 29, 2005
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Problem: Companies need to take a more realistic approach to speech technologies.

Recently, a potential Amtrak customer called the companys automated phone system to get fare information. Heres how the conversation went:

“Hi!” exclaimed a recorded voice infused with welcoming, patient positivity. “Im Julie, Amtraks automated agent. Lets get started. What city are you departing from?”

“New York,” the customer said.

“Hmm. I think you said Newark,” Julie said. “Is this correct?”

“No,” the customer said.

“Okay,” Julie said. “Lets try again. What city are you departing from?”

“Manhattan,” the customer replied.

“I think you said Meriden, Connecticut,” Julie said. “Is this correct?”

Eventually Julie gave up and put the customer through to an actual human being.

While its true that speech recognition systems have improved steadily over the past two decades, it has been a painfully slow progression. Often their use in call center applications seems specifically designed to annoy rather than to serve. Touch-tone systems are maddening enough, but trying to converse with artificially unintelligent digital drones can send a customer right over the edge.

/zimages/3/28571.gifClick hereto read about how Del Monte cut its help desk calls by 90 percent.

Some experts say the reason why speech recognition has earned its bad reputation is that consumers have unfair expectations of what the software can do.

“You say speech recognition, and consumers automatically expect HAL from 2001: A Space Odyssey,” said Art Schoeller of Yankee Group Research Inc. And companies that use the technology tend to over-promise and under-deliver on that expectation; they create realistic personas to make customers feel as if they are speaking to a live agent.

So why would any company want to use this floundering technology? The answer is simple: to cut costs. Automated customer service (often referred to as “customer self-service”), whether speech-enabled or touch-tone, costs a fraction of the price of staffing call centers with live agents. And voice systems are designed to handle more complex transactions, such as travel reservations.

According to Forrester Research Inc., customer service calls handled by automated systems cost an average of 20 cents per minute, compared with $7 per minute for live help.

Advertisement

But the Web has proven an even more effective tool for those complex kinds of customer interactions, and the speech recognition market has suffered as a result.

/zimages/3/28571.gifRead the full story on CIOInsight.com: Weak Speech Recognition Leaves Customers Cold

/zimages/3/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, reviews and analysis about productivity and business solutions.

eWEEK EDITORS

eWeek editors publish top thought leaders and leading experts in emerging technology across a wide variety of Enterprise B2B sectors. Our focus is providing actionable information for today’s technology decision makers.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。