XML Web Services: Means to an End

Published: Aug 28, 2002
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

BOSTON—For the second day in a row at the XML Web Services One conference here, a keynote speaker got up and signaled the impending end to the Web services era, at least on a standards level.

Don Box, an architect in Microsoft Corp.s developer division told an audience of Web services conference attendees Wednesday: “The end of the XML Web services era is near. I predict two years from now we wont have this conference.”

Box said XML Web services are a means to an end. “We have to get the plumbing sorted out,” he said. “We have a couple more years of plumbing work, but after that we move on to applications,” he said. Box said the “protocol work is starting to wind down, the infrastructure is catching up with protocols and its time to start thinking about applications.”

On Tuesday at the conference, Robert Sutor, director of e-business standards strategy, said he believes the industry has about another six-to-nine months of Web services standardization work to do and then another couple of years to focus on applications and implementing the standards.

Box said Microsoft has been “moving awfully fast” with its Global XML Architecture (GXA) for Web services. “We cant rev [revise] the .Net Framework fast enough to keep up with the innovation in GXA.” Box cited an interoperability demonstration between IBM and Microsoft here at the conference as evidence that the technology is constantly improving.

But, Box posed the question of why Microsoft is pursuing a Web services strategy. “Because we hit the wall with the prior technology,” he said. He said Microsofts COM (Component Object Model) and DCOM (Distributed Component Object Model) hit the wall. “On the XML front we needed a replacement for DCOM, so XML Web services is the way we went. Microsoft has bet the company on this thing and it is our intention to make all software integration based on Web services.”

In addition, he said, some of the Web services standards are mature and need to be finalized. He said the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.3 is a bad idea because the specification covers all the necessary functionality for a SOAP implementation. “SOAP 1.2 should be the end of the line,” he said.

Box also said Universal Description, Discovery and Integration (UDDI) is the technology of the future, but that may change in 2003. Microsoft is shipping UDDI as part of its operating system, Box said.

Advertisement

Related Stories:

  • Standardizing Web Services Nears Completion
  • WS-Security Spec Sent to OASIS
  • Web Services in Hand
Darryl K. Taft

Darryl K. Taft

Content Writer

Darryl K. Taft covers the development tools and developer-related issues beat from his office in Baltimore. He has more than 10 years of experience in the business and is always looking for the next scoop. Taft is a member of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and was named 'one of the most active middleware reporters in the world' by The Middleware Co. He also has his own card in the 'Who's Who in Enterprise Java' deck.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。