DOJ Asks Google for More Info on Motorola Bid

執筆者
Clint Boulton
Clint Boulton
Published: Sep 29, 2011
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

The U.S. Justice Department has issued a second request for information from Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) concerning the company’s $12.5 billion purchase for Motorola Mobility (NYSE:MMI), the Android OEM Google has picked to protect it from patent litigation.

Google Aug. 15 bid to acquire Motorola, claiming the company’s 17,000-plus current and 7,500 pending patents would provide the company protection against those who want to sue Google for patent infringement. Google would also likely use the company’s set-top box business to boost its Google TV service.

Motorola makes several leading Android handsets, including many of Verizon Wireless’ (NYSE:VZW) signature Droid models. Even though Google vowed to let Motorola operate on its own, there have been questions as to whether Google is looking to wall off its open-source operating system from other OEMs.

As all large acquisition plays by Google do today, the Motorola bid caught the attention of the DOJ, which in April cleared the search provider’s $700 million acquisition of travel software maker ITA Software.

Google had hoped to close the deal by the end of the year, or by early 2012, but that timeline has certainly been thrown off track with the DOJ’s request for more info on the merger. This doesn’t mean the DOJ will block the deal, but it does mean it found enough antitrust concerns to merit a closer look.

“We believe very strongly this is a pro-competitive transaction that is good for Motorola Mobility, good for consumers and good for our partners,” said Denny Woodside, a senior vice president at Google.

“That said, we know that close scrutiny is part of the process and we’ve been talking to the U.S. Department of Justice over the past few weeks. Today we received what is called a ‘second request,’ which means that the DOJ is asking for more information so that they can continue to review the deal. (This is pretty routine; we’ve gotten these kind of requests before.)”

Routine might be an overstatement. The company received second requests from the DOJ in the ITA deal, and received one in June from the DOJ over its $400 million Admeld buy. Google also fielded second requests from the Federal Trade Commission over its deal to buy AdMob for $50 million in 2010, and for its $3.1 billion DoubleClick deal in 2007.

Advertisement

However, as AllThingsDigital noted, only 4 percent of transactions received a second request last year from U.S. antitrust agencies. It just so happens Google, owing to its size and dominant position online, gets more than the average company.

Still, the DOJ is likely to bless the Motorola bid because it’s a vertical merger concocted by two companies whose businesses are more symbiotic than directly competitive.

Getting Motorola is more important than ever for Google, allowing the search provider to protect the Android OEM that hasn’t capitulated to Microsoft in patent litigation. HTC and now Samsung agreed to pay Microsoft licensing fees for Android handsets they sell.

Clint Boulton

Clint Boulton

Content Writer

Clint Boulton is a ServerWatch contributor and a senior writer for CIO.com covering IT leadership, the CIO role, and digital transformation.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。