Verizon’s ‘Mystery Fees’ Payout Was a Sham, Says FCC Petition

Published: Jul 3, 2013
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
Verizon’s ‘Mystery Fees’ Payout Was a Sham, Says FCC Petition
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Verizon’s “mystery charges” problem may not be solved after all.

Verizon paid out $78 million in 2010, after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) found that the carrier had wrongly added Internet connection fees of $1.99—”mystery fees,” as they came to be known—to the statements of approximately 15 million customers over a stretch of three years.

Of that sum, $52.8 million went to customers, while $25 million was a “voluntary contribution” to the U.S. Treasury.

Now, a Washington, D.C., lawyer is saying Verizon got off easy. The amount Verizon collected through its false charges may be closer to $240 million.

Arthur V. Belendiuk filed a petition with the FCC July 2, The New York Times reported the same day. According to documents he obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, Belendiuk says Verizon “vastly understated the amount it collected from false data charges on customer bills when it agreed to refund the levies in 2010,” wrote the Times.

It added that in his petition, Belendiuk said that after Verizon fixed the flaw that was causing the $1.99 charges, Verizon’s revenue dropped by approximately $8 million per month.”

Multiply $8 million times 12 months in a year, for three years, and you’re at $288 million. Minus the roughly $50 million mea culpa Verizon paid customers, and one is in the ballpark of $240 million.

Verizon isn’t commenting on the petition, except to say that it’s without merit.

Belendiuk’s office released a July 2 statement saying that while the Verizon Consent Decree was the highest ever paid, the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau didn’t verify that Verizon’s payment represented a full refund.

“The Enforcement Bureau conducted its investigation behind closed doors, withholding from the public its two letters of inquiry and numerous responses by Verizon Wireless,” said the statement.

It went on to say that Verizon responded to a 2010 FOIA request with a document “so heavily redacted by Verizon Wireless as to be useless.”

Belendiuk then filed a lawsuit under the FOIA with a Washington, D.C., court. The case was ultimately settled with Verizon and the FCC handing over the requested documents in March 2013.

Advertisement

“This two-and-a-half-year legal process is a vivid example of the FCC subjugating the public’s right to know under the law to the interests of its largest regulated companies,” said the statement.

“More importantly,” it continued, “the disclosed documents reveal that Verizon Wireless was aware of the overcharges at the same time as it was denying the problem to complaining customers and it was representing under oath to the FCC that the data charges were legitimate and proper.”

Announcing Oct. 28, 2010, that the matter had been settled, Michele Ellison, chief of the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau, said in a statement: “Mystery solved: today’s settlement with Verizon Wireless is about making things right and putting consumers back in the driver’s seat.”

Follow Michelle Maisto on Twitter

Michelle Maisto

Michelle Maisto

Content Writer

Michelle Maisto has been covering the enterprise mobility space for a decade, beginning with Knowledge Management, Field Force Automation and eCRM, and most recently as the editor-in-chief of Mobile Enterprise magazine. She earned an MFA in nonfiction writing from Columbia University.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。