Apple iPad 2 Tops Consumer Reports’ Tablet Ratings

Published: Apr 5, 2011
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Consumer Reports may have longstanding issues with the iPhone 4, but its editors have decided to give a big thumbs-up to the new iPad 2.

The publication tested 10 tablets, including the Motorola Xoom and Samsung Galaxy Tab, before deciding that the 32GB iPad 2 with WiFi and 3G ranked highest across 17 criteria ranging from portability to touch-screen responsiveness. The first-generation iPad apparently tied with the Motorola Xoom, which runs the tablet-optimized Google Android 3.0 (“Honeycomb”) and is widely regarded as the iPad franchise’s most robust competition.

“So far, Apple is leading the tablet market in both quality and price, which is unusual for a company whose products are usually premium priced,” Paul Reynolds, Consumer Reports’ electronics editor, wrote in an April 5 statement. “However, it’s likely we’ll see more competitive pricing in tablets as other models begin to hit the market.”

Consumer Reports recommends that consumers in the market for a tablet consider a higher-priced device. “With prices for the best tablets still too high for many budgets, consumers may be tempted by lower-priced competitors. Don’t be,” the publication wrote in an April 5 statement. “Tests have found the performance of models costing $300 and under to be at best mediocre.”

Other details for consumers to consider: easy navigation, easy-to-use virtual keyboard, automatic orientation from landscape to portrait mode (and vice versa), a GPS receiver and other components for “environmental awareness,” access to a full apps marketplace, high-quality display, and capacitive touch screen.

Should the consumer consider an Android tablet, Consumer Reports added, “the Android tablet you buy should have at least Android 2.2 and access to the Android Market, not a secondary app market.”

Consumer Reports sparked a bit of controversy among Apple fans in 2010, when it refused to recommend the iPhone 4 on AT&T’s network. In their accompanying report, the editors cited how the device’s signal would die when bare skin touched the lower-left portion of the device’s antenna rim. “The signal can degrade enough to cause you to lose your connection altogether if you’re in an area with a weak signal,” the publication’s Mike Gikas blogged July 12. “Due to this problem, we can’t recommend the iPhone 4.”

Advertisement

Apple CEO Steve Jobs later announced that customers who purchased an iPhone 4 through Sept. 30, 2010, would be eligible to receive a free rubber bumper that covered the rim.

However, the controversy continued into 2011, when Consumer Reports declined to recommend the iPhone 4 when it appeared on Verizon. “The problem is similar to the one we confirmed in July with the AT&T version of Apple’s newest smartphone,” the publication reported in a Feb. 25 blog posting.

Nicholas Kolakowski

Nicholas Kolakowski

Content Writer

Nicholas Kolakowski is a staff editor at eWEEK, covering Microsoft and other companies in the enterprise space, as well as evolving technology such as tablet PCs. His work has appeared in The Washington Post, Playboy, WebMD, AARP the Magazine, AutoWeek, Washington City Paper, Trader Monthly, and Private Air.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。