FTC Sues Qualcomm, Alleging Patent Antitrust Violations

Published: Jan 17, 2017
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
FTC Sues Qualcomm, Alleging Patent Antitrust Violations
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Chipmaker Qualcomm, which provides the electronic brains for Android smartphones around the world, ended 2016 with legal trouble in the Far East and is starting out 2017 with equally serious legal issues in the U.S.

Iroincally, none of this litigation has anything to do with the processors themselves.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission Jan. 17 filed a lawsuit against the San Diego, Calif.-based processor maker, accusing the company of antitrust violations in conducting its patent-licensing business.

The FTC, which works with the Justice Department to enforce antitrust law, claims that Qualcomm used its dominance in supplying base-band processors used in smartphones and tablets to arm-twist licensees and extract elevated royalties for patents in what the complaint dubbed a “no license-no chips” policy.

Qualcomm makes processors for virtually all Android phones and tablets used in the world.

Similarly, South Korea on Dec. 27 slapped Qualcomm with a $852.9 million fine for alleged antitrust violations involving its patent licensing business. The Korea Fair Trade Commission charged that Qualcomm unfairly limited the access of competing chipset makers to its patents and used its position as a key supplier as leverage in its negotiations to make mobile-phone producers agree to unfair conditions.

South Korea may have felt emboldened to do this after the Qualcomm agreed to a $975 million settlement in China in February 2015 for similar antitrust violations. In December 2015, the European Union accused the company of abusing its market power to thwart rivals, but no litigation has ensued as yet.

The Chinese payoff is the action that has appeared to have opened a Pandora’s box for future litigation.

Back in the U.S. on Jan. 17, the FTC asked the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose to order Qualcomm to cease this and related practices.

The company’s stock price fell 4 percent to $64.19 after the news broke earlier in the day.

Chris Preimesberger

Chris J. Preimesberger is Editor Emeritus of eWEEK. In his 16 years and more than 5,000 articles at eWEEK, he distinguished himself in reporting and analysis of the business use of new-gen IT in a variety of sectors, including cloud computing, data center systems, storage, edge systems, security and others. In February 2017 and September 2018, Chris was named among the 250 most influential business journalists in the world (https://richtopia.com/inspirational-people/top-250-business-journalists/) by Richtopia, a UK research firm that used analytics to compile the ranking. He has won several national and regional awards for his work, including a 2011 Folio Award for a profile (https://www.eweek.com/cloud/marc-benioff-trend-seer-and-business-socialist/) of Salesforce founder/CEO Marc Benioff--the only time he has entered the competition. Previously, Chris was a founding editor of both IT Manager's Journal and DevX.com and was managing editor of Software Development magazine. He has been a stringer for the Associated Press since 1983 and resides in Silicon Valley.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。