Blekko Has Usability Issues as it Seeks to Bite Google

執筆者
Clint Boulton
Clint Boulton
Published: Nov 2, 2010
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

It may never be fair to cry “Dead Man Walkin'” for a brand new Web service, but unfortunately that’s the conclusion I’ve come to after playing with new curated search service Blekko this morning.

Blekko is geared to cut out the clutter of Web search on Google, Bing and Yahoo.

You know, the kind of clutter where you search for something and get 40,000 results, most of which aren’t really useful.

Blekko gets points for that, but to do this users need to create slashtags, or little vertical search categories for favorite Websites and topics. Users can follow other users slashtags and message them within Blekko if they choose.

Once these vertical searches are established, or users find existing slashtags, Blekko becomes a blast to use. It’s getting to that point that sucks and it will be work, not fun, for the bulk of users who try it.

I set up a favorite list slashtag, adding some of my favorite Websites. Then I searched within them and Blekko really worked well.

But no matter how good Blekko was at cutting out the crud, it was still work time that I could be spending on something else.

Blekko is an exemplar of Web service creation, but this produces it’s own hairy mess: who wants to spend time curating search? I don’t.

Google is great because I go there, type in a search, and often find what I need within the search bar from Google Suggest, or even from Google Instant when I’m not searching from my iGoogle homepage. It’s simple and it works.

Blekko’s barrier to usefulness is too high. Sure, you can skip the slashtags and do good ole-fashioned general purpose Web search, and Blekko offers suggested queries, but what would be the point?

That’s what Google has covered for 66 percent of U.S. users. Those who don’t Google, use Yahoo or Bing it.

My guess is the die-hard blogging corps in Silicon Valley will praise this approach, tired of tired Google searches for the last decade.

They like to write about services invested in by trendy VCs because it endears them to those guys for access on other issues.

Advertisement

But this simply won’t catch on with anyone by industry insiders who thumb their nose at traditional services that just work even if they are cluttered.

That’s what search startups have become: homes for niche users fed up with a solution that bores them with too many nonsequitur results, even if it is efficient.

Look at Cuil (dead), Powerset (bought for semantic technology) and Wowd (who?). Case closed.

Clint Boulton

Clint Boulton

Content Writer

Clint Boulton is a ServerWatch contributor and a senior writer for CIO.com covering IT leadership, the CIO role, and digital transformation.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。