Google’s Big Trouble in China Over Gmail Hacks

執筆者
Clint Boulton
Clint Boulton
Published: Jun 7, 2011
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

A Chinese government newspaper took issue with Google’s accusation that it had traced cyber-attacks on Gmail accounts to that country, claiming that the search-engine giant was simply trying to stir political unrest.

Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) June 1 disrupted a phishing scam that duped senior U.S. government officials, Chinese political activists and others into giving up their Gmail passwords so that an attacker could read and forward their email messages.

The attack affected hundreds of users and appeared to hail from Jinan, China, which is home to one of the People’s Liberation Army’s technical reconnaissance bureaus, or China’s equivalent of the National Security Agency in the United States.

Google’s implication was that the Chinese government was behind the attacks. Hong Lei, spokesman for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, denied his government had anything to do with the attacks, calling them “fabrication out of thin air” and “unacceptable.”

The People’s Daily, which writes on behalf of China’s Communist Party, said June 6 that Google made its claims out of “a vicious intent of sparking new disputes concerning Internet security between China and the U.S,” according to The Wall Street Journal.

People’s Daily editor Zhang Yixuan also lobbed a veiled threat at the search-engine company when he wrote in the front-page editorial: “Google shouldn’t engulf itself in the international political war as a tool for political gaming,” If there is “any change in the international atmosphere, I am afraid Google will become a target to be sacrificed by politics, and also will be discarded by the market.”

The implication is that Google would lose more face, political capital and market share if it pursued its allegations against the country. There is precedent for this.

The company lost search market share to market leader Baidu after tracing cyber-attacks on Gmail accounts of Chinese dissidents and human-rights activists to China. Google, which threatened to exit China entirely, ceased censoring search results there and sent users to the Google.hk domain in Hong Kong.

Google, which passed its evidence of the Gmail hacks along to the FBI, declined to comment directly on the editorial. However, a spokesperson told eWEEK: “We think users should be aware of the disturbing campaign we’ve uncovered to collect user passwords and monitor user email. Our focus now is on protecting our users and making sure everyone knows how to stay safe online.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) wrote to Google CEO Larry Page on Monday requesting more information on the Gmail phishing attacks. Issa asked Google not only to name all federal employees targeted in the attack, but also to disclose all communications related to Google’s response.

Google told eWEEK it is reviewing Issa’s letter, adding: “We believe that discussing security issues facing our industry helps users better protect themselves from phishing scams and other common threats.”

Clint Boulton

Clint Boulton

Content Writer

Clint Boulton is a ServerWatch contributor and a senior writer for CIO.com covering IT leadership, the CIO role, and digital transformation.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。