Theft of Veterans Data Shows Security Policy Gap

Published: May 23, 2006
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek のコンテンツおよび製品のおすすめは、編集上の独立性を保っています。パートナーへのリンクをクリックすると、当社が報酬を得る場合があります。 詳細を見る

Now that the personal electronic information of 26.5 million military veterans has been stolen, it is time to revisit my column, “Lundquists Guide to Not Getting Fired for Losing Your Laptop,” which I wrote in March. I followed that one up with a look at port security after the L.A. Times did an article on security breaches in Afghanistan involving stolen USB devices.

The theft of the vets data sets a new record, I believe, for names and data lost by poor data management on a laptop. (There has been at least one bigger potential theft, according to a New York Times chart, but that was a hack into a credit card management company.)

In the IT community, such data losses result in consternation over how much sensitive data is still traveling unfettered and unwatched on laptops and USB devices, or available for an easy download over a fast Internet connection.

/zimages/2/28571.gifFor advice on how to secure your network and applications, as well as the latest security news, visit Ziff Davis InternetsSecurity IT Hub.

Why do these losses continue to happen? Is there simply a lot less common sense among executives and analysts than there should be?

I dont know about common sense, but I do know that traveling about with large amounts of data simply becomes a lot easier as data transfer speeds increase and disk storage becomes limitless. While 26.5 million names, Social Security numbers and other data sounds like a lot, that database of information certainly contains a lot less data than that DVD of Star Wars.

The day after the theft of the vets data took place, I was having a morning cup of coffee with two IT execs who are part of our Corporate Partner program. Their advice for other IT execs? Polices and procedures precede products in data security.

The coolest encryption appliance wont do you any good if you dont know what needs to be encrypted. The hard work of writing a policy and the harder work of continuing to monitor and enforce that policy are what makes data protection plans work.

Sorry, there is no quick fix to this problem, but it is an issue that should be at the top of your technology agenda.

Advertisement

eWEEK magazine editor in chief Eric Lundquist can be reached at eric_lundquist@ziffdavis.com.

/zimages/2/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest security news, reviews and analysis. And for insights on security coverage around the Web, take a look at eWEEK.com Security Center Editor Larry Seltzers Weblog.

Eric Lundquist

Eric Lundquist

Content Writer

Since 1996, Eric Lundquist has been Editor in Chief of eWEEK, which includes domestic, international and online editions. As eWEEK's EIC, Lundquist oversees a staff of nearly 40 editors, reporters and Labs analysts covering product, services and companies in the high-technology community. He is a frequent speaker at industry gatherings and user events and sits on numerous advisory boards. Eric writes the popular weekly column, 'Up Front,' and he is a confidant of eWEEK's Spencer F. Katt gossip columnist.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

TechnologyAdvice が所有・運営しています。 © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. 無断転載を禁じます

広告主に関する開示:このサイトに掲載されている製品の一部は、TechnologyAdvice が報酬を受け取っている企業のものです。この報酬は、製品がこのサイトのどこにどのように表示されるか(表示される順序など)に影響する場合があります。TechnologyAdvice は、市場で入手可能なすべての企業やすべての種類の製品を掲載しているわけではありません。