Review: Non-Traditional Antivirus

Escrito por
Larry Seltzer
Larry Seltzer
Published: Jun 8, 2004
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek mantém conteúdo e recomendações de produtos editorialmente independentes. Podemos ganhar dinheiro quando você clica em links de nossos parceiros. Saiba mais

“Why me?” Thats what plenty of PC users were asking themselves last December, shortly after they opened an e-mail message from an acquaintance with this subject line and found their systems infected with Win32/Sober.C, yet another in a seemingly endless stream of worms zooming around the Internet.

Many of those infected were probably good Internet citizens, running antivirus software with up-to-date signatures that should have stopped every known virus in the wild. Unfortunately, too often today, worms (viruslike programs that can spread themselves to other machines without user intervention) get into the wild before antivirus companies can create and distribute appropriate signatures. Technically, most recent worms are fairly unsophisticated, but they all use clever social-engineering tricks (the e-mail address of someone known to the recipient, with enticing subject lines, message text, and attachment names) to make people open the files, thus kicking off incredibly rapid outbreaks.

According to AV-Test.org, a project of the Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany and AV-Test GmbH, the Romania-based Softwin (creator of BitDefender) was the first antivirus company to have a definition for Sober.C—10 hours after the virus was first detected. Symantec didnt have a signature available until more than a day after the first sighting, and McAfees came a day after that. In an article on outbreak response time in the February 2004 Virus Bulletin (www.virusbtn.com), AV-Tests Andreas Marx was quick to point out that the company that was first for this particular virus may not be first the next time. But it doesnt really matter. Even a 10-hour response time is too slow.

Larry Seltzer

Larry Seltzer

Content Writer

Larry Seltzer has been writing software for and English about computers ever since—,much to his own amazement— He was one of the authors of NPL and NPL-R, fourth-generation languages for microcomputers by the now-defunct DeskTop Software Corporation. (Larry is sad to find absolutely no hits on any of these +products on Google.) His work at Desktop Software included programming the UCSD p-System, a virtual machine-based operating system with portable binaries that pre-dated Java by more than 10 years.For several years, he wrote corporate software for Mathematica Policy Research (they're still in business!) and Chase Econometrics (not so lucky) before being forcibly thrown into the consulting market. He bummed around the Philadelphia consulting and contract-programming scenes for a year or two before taking a job at NSTL (National Software Testing Labs) developing product tests and managing contract testing for the computer industry, governments and publication.In 1991 Larry moved to Massachusetts to become Technical Director of PC Week Labs (now eWeek Labs). He moved within Ziff Davis to New York in 1994 to run testing at Windows Sources. In 1995, he became Technical Director for Internet product testing at PC Magazine and stayed there till 1998.Since then, he has been writing for numerous other publications, including Fortune Small Business, Windows 2000 Magazine (now Windows and .NET Magazine), ZDNet and Sam Whitmore's Media Survey.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Propriedade da TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Todos os direitos reservados

Divulgação de anunciantes: alguns dos produtos que aparecem neste site são de empresas das quais a TechnologyAdvice recebe remuneração. Essa remuneração pode influenciar como e onde os produtos aparecem neste site, incluindo, por exemplo, a ordem em que aparecem. A TechnologyAdvice não inclui todas as empresas nem todos os tipos de produtos disponíveis no mercado.