FTC Sues Qualcomm, Alleging Patent Antitrust Violations

FTC Sues Qualcomm, Alleging Patent Antitrust Violations
Jan 17, 2017
2 minute read
eWeek content and product recommendations are editorially independent. We may make money when you click on links to our partners. Learn More

Chipmaker Qualcomm, which provides the electronic brains for Android smartphones around the world, ended 2016 with legal trouble in the Far East and is starting out 2017 with equally serious legal issues in the U.S.

Iroincally, none of this litigation has anything to do with the processors themselves.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission Jan. 17 filed a lawsuit against the San Diego, Calif.-based processor maker, accusing the company of antitrust violations in conducting its patent-licensing business.

The FTC, which works with the Justice Department to enforce antitrust law, claims that Qualcomm used its dominance in supplying base-band processors used in smartphones and tablets to arm-twist licensees and extract elevated royalties for patents in what the complaint dubbed a “no license-no chips” policy.

Qualcomm makes processors for virtually all Android phones and tablets used in the world.

Similarly, South Korea on Dec. 27 slapped Qualcomm with a $852.9 million fine for alleged antitrust violations involving its patent licensing business. The Korea Fair Trade Commission charged that Qualcomm unfairly limited the access of competing chipset makers to its patents and used its position as a key supplier as leverage in its negotiations to make mobile-phone producers agree to unfair conditions.

South Korea may have felt emboldened to do this after the Qualcomm agreed to a $975 million settlement in China in February 2015 for similar antitrust violations. In December 2015, the European Union accused the company of abusing its market power to thwart rivals, but no litigation has ensued as yet.

The Chinese payoff is the action that has appeared to have opened a Pandora’s box for future litigation.

Back in the U.S. on Jan. 17, the FTC asked the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose to order Qualcomm to cease this and related practices.

The company’s stock price fell 4 percent to $64.19 after the news broke earlier in the day.

Chris Preimesberger

Chris J. Preimesberger is Editor Emeritus of eWEEK. In his 16 years and more than 5,000 articles at eWEEK, he distinguished himself in reporting and analysis of the business use of new-gen IT in a variety of sectors, including cloud computing, data center systems, storage, edge systems, security and others. In February 2017 and September 2018, Chris was named among the 250 most influential business journalists in the world (https://richtopia.com/inspirational-people/top-250-business-journalists/) by Richtopia, a UK research firm that used analytics to compile the ranking. He has won several national and regional awards for his work, including a 2011 Folio Award for a profile (https://www.eweek.com/cloud/marc-benioff-trend-seer-and-business-socialist/) of Salesforce founder/CEO Marc Benioff--the only time he has entered the competition. Previously, Chris was a founding editor of both IT Manager's Journal and DevX.com and was managing editor of Software Development magazine. He has been a stringer for the Associated Press since 1983 and resides in Silicon Valley.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Property of TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.