Circuit-Switched Networks

Verfasst von
eWEEK EDITORS
eWEEK EDITORS
Published: Sep 24, 2001
Updated: Feb 2, 2021
2 minute read
eWeek Inhalte und Produktempfehlungen sind redaktionell unabhängig. Wir können Geld verdienen, wenn Sie auf Links zu unseren Partnern klicken. Mehr erfahren

Most enterprises are poorly prepared to deal with natural disasters or terrorist attacks, often because they wrongly assume their circuit-switched networks have end-to-end backup resiliency.

The typical enterprise relies on an amalgam of circuit-switched, Ethernet, IP and wireless networks that far too often share the same central office and dont have the redundant routing to survive a direct hit to that office.

Circuit-switched networks have been rapped for not having the resiliency and redundancy to reroute traffic that runs into a fiber or wire cut, because they dont have as many dispersed points of presence as IP networks have.

But the big problem for enterprises running circuit-switched networks is that first stretch that connects them to the public network – a vulnerable mile, or two or three, that links them to a solitary central office shared by several carriers and service providers.

And thats a vulnerability that circuit-switched networks share with Ethernet, IP, data-only and sometimes even cable networks. If a tornado, earthquake, ice storm or terrorist attack disables that shared central office or the lines leading to it, all data and voice communications for miles around could stop dead in their routes.

Small and midsize enterprises rarely have backup lines connecting them to the public network – and when they do, they too often find that both lines go to the same central office.

Businesses wrongly think theyre protecting themselves by getting one line from, say, Verizon to connect to the public network, then turning to a second carrier for backup, Gartners Neil said. “What they dont know is both those companies are sharing or storing their equipment at the same premises.”

Jack Norris, head of customer service and equipment of global carrier Equant, said the ideal safeguard is diverse local loops. “Theyre not always available,” he said. But office buildings that are served by >> more than one central office can install separate routes to the outside, and so offer the peace of mind that comes from redundancy.

Still, information managers have to be careful. A building may be served by both an incumbent carrier, such as BellSouth, and a competitive carrier, but that doesnt mean the two carriers are taking separate routes to the Internet.

Advertisement

“Its going to be quite expensive, but you have to look at this as an insurance policy – balance it against what it would cost to be knocked out of business for eight hours or a day or a week,” Neil said.

eWEEK EDITORS

eWeek editors publish top thought leaders and leading experts in emerging technology across a wide variety of Enterprise B2B sectors. Our focus is providing actionable information for today’s technology decision makers.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Eigentum von TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Alle Rechte vorbehalten

Werbetreibenden-Offenlegung: Einige der auf dieser Website erscheinenden Produkte stammen von Unternehmen, von denen TechnologyAdvice eine Vergütung erhält. Diese Vergütung kann beeinflussen, wie und wo Produkte auf dieser Website erscheinen, einschließlich beispielsweise der Reihenfolge, in der sie erscheinen. TechnologyAdvice schließt nicht alle Unternehmen oder alle auf dem Marktplatz verfügbaren Produkttypen ein.