Elon Musk’s SpaceX to Acquire AI Startup Cursor for $60B | eWeek

Elon Musk’s SpaceX to Acquire AI Startup Cursor for $60B

The Neuron newsletter graphic titled SpaceX to Acquire Cursor for 60B dollars featuring an astronaut cat.

Image: The Neuron

Verfasst von
Grant Harvey
Grant Harvey
Jun 17, 2026
2 minute read
eWeek Inhalte und Produktempfehlungen sind redaktionell unabhängig. Wir können Geld verdienen, wenn Sie auf Links zu unseren Partnern klicken. Mehr erfahren

The hottest coding app in AI just became part of Elon Musk’s trillion-dollar rocket empire.

That’s right: SpaceX will acquire Cursor, the AI coding startup behind the editor used by millions of developers, in a $60 billion all-stock deal. The deal is expected to close in Q3, according to Axios, and Business Insider reports it comes days after SpaceX’s record IPO.

Here's what happened

  • Cursor’s parent company, Anysphere, is being acquired by SpaceX for $60 billion.
  • The deal is being paid in SpaceX shares, which makes SpaceX’s sky-high public valuation part of the acquisition currency.
  • Cursor reportedly raised $3.38 billion since its 2022 founding from investors including Thrive, a16z, the OpenAI Startup Fund, and Nvidia.
  • Business Insider reported that Cursor’s annualized revenue passed $1 billion after growing 10x in under a year.

And Cursor is also teasing a much bigger push on models.


At its Compile event, Morgan Linton shared a video of Cursor announcing a new model (Composer 3), while Nick Dobos said it is in the same size class as Claude Opus and GPT-5.5, trained from scratch with no Kimi (open Chinese model) base, built with 10-20x more compute than Composer 1, and expected in the next couple of weeks. Ray Fernando added that the model has 1.5 trillion+ parameters, was retrained on 100k+ GPUs, and is aimed at intelligence beyond coding.

That is the real bet. Cursor is no longer only a smarter code editor. It is becoming the workflow layer for software teams where humans and agents write, review, merge, and ship code together. And if those event posts are right, the Anysphere SpaceX combo could become a legitimate fourth leg in the frontier model lab four-legged race, rather than just the app sitting on top of other people’s models.

Many businesses are warming to this idea now after the whole Fable 5 debacle.

Why this matters

Coding agents are now a strategic part of the infrastructure.

For SpaceX, owning Cursor could mean faster internal software development across rockets, satellites, autonomy, manufacturing, and Grok (and less reliance on ever-more-unreliable Claude models… except for revenue from SpaceX datacenters).

For regular people (who we affectionately call normies), you might not care about yet another serious coding model, but remember this: eventually, all models will be coding models, and you will just ask them for things, and they will build them for you on the spot. So you want lots of competition to make this affordable for you to use without paying enterprise prices.  

Editor’s note: This article originally appeared on our sister publication, The Neuron.


Grant Harvey

Grant Harvey is the Lead Writer of The Neuron, where he continues to lead the publication's daily coverage of AI news, tools, and trends.

eWeek Logo

eWeek has the latest technology news and analysis, buying guides, and product reviews for IT professionals and technology buyers. The site's focus is on innovative solutions and covering in-depth technical content. eWeek stays on the cutting edge of technology news and IT trends through interviews and expert analysis. Gain insight from top innovators and thought leaders in the fields of IT, business, enterprise software, startups, and more.

Eigentum von TechnologyAdvice. © 2026 TechnologyAdvice. Alle Rechte vorbehalten

Werbetreibenden-Offenlegung: Einige der auf dieser Website erscheinenden Produkte stammen von Unternehmen, von denen TechnologyAdvice eine Vergütung erhält. Diese Vergütung kann beeinflussen, wie und wo Produkte auf dieser Website erscheinen, einschließlich beispielsweise der Reihenfolge, in der sie erscheinen. TechnologyAdvice schließt nicht alle Unternehmen oder alle auf dem Marktplatz verfügbaren Produkttypen ein.