Meta AI Glasses Footage Reviewed by Humans, Including Intimate Moments

Meta’s AI smart glasses may be capturing more than users realize.

Footage recorded by the devices — including highly intimate moments — can be reviewed by human workers helping train the company’s AI systems. According to the BBC, outsourced reviewers responsible for labeling the data say they have encountered deeply personal footage while doing the work.

The news raises fresh questions about how recordings from the glasses are handled behind the scenes.

A watchdog starts asking questions

Those concerns have now reached regulators. The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) said the claims are “concerning”, confirming it will contact Meta to request details on how the company collects, processes, and safeguards personal data captured by the glasses.

The watchdog added that devices handling personal data must give users clear control and transparency over how information is used, a standard it expects companies developing AI-powered wearables to meet.

When smart glasses capture too much

The investigation found that some of the material ends up in the hands of data annotators working for Sama, a Nairobi-based outsourcing firm that provides AI training services. Their job is to review images captured by the glasses and label what appears in them so the system can better interpret the world around the wearer.

Workers told the investigation that the material can be deeply personal. In some cases, reviewers said they saw footage of people using the toilet, watching pornography, or recordings captured after glasses were left running in private spaces. 

The role also extends beyond images. Annotators review transcripts of interactions with the AI to verify whether the system correctly answered users’ questions about what the glasses were seeing. 

Meta defends its data review practices

Meta says the review process is part of how it improves the experience of its AI-powered glasses. The company told the BBC that when people share content with Meta AI, some images or videos may be examined by contractors to help refine how the system understands what it sees.

The company added that data is filtered before review to protect privacy, including measures such as blurring faces in images. However, sources cited in the investigation said those safeguards do not always work as intended, meaning identifiable details can still appear in some footage.

The privacy trade-offs of AI-powered smart glasses

Meta’s glasses record photos and videos using a small built-in camera that users can activate by pressing a button or issuing a voice command. A small indicator light on the frame is designed to signal when recording is taking place.

Still, the rapid rise of AI-powered wearables has sparked broader concerns about misuse. As the devices become more common, critics warn they could be used to capture people without their knowledge, adding a new layer of privacy risk to everyday spaces.

Those worries have already surfaced in unexpected places. According to CBS News, a California judge recently scolded members of Mark Zuckerberg’s team for wearing Ray-Ban Meta AI glasses into a Los Angeles courtroom during a social media trial, warning that any recordings would have to be destroyed.

As AI-powered glasses move further into everyday life, questions about where their recordings end up and who gets to see them are likely to follow.

Meta’s chatbot is being tested as a tool for browsing products with prices.