Close
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
Read Down
Sign in
Close
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Read Down
Password recovery
Recover your password
Close
Search
Menu
Search
  • Latest News
  • Cybersecurity
  • Big Data and Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Mobile
  • Networking
  • Storage
  • Applications
  • IT Management
  • Small Business
  • Development
  • Database
  • Servers
  • Android
  • Apple
  • Innovation
  • Blogs
  • PC Hardware
  • Reviews
  • Search Engines
  • Virtualization
More
    Home Apple
    • Apple
    • IT Management

    Judge Delays Decision on Mac Rumor Sites

    By
    Daniel Drew Turner
    -
    March 4, 2005
    Share
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Linkedin

      On Friday, Judge James Kleinberg delayed a final ruling on whether three Web sites can be classified as legitimate journalistic outlets and can claim protection under reporter shield laws, thereby avoiding subpoenas from Cupertino, Calif.-based Apple Computer Inc.

      The company recently filed a complaint against the sites—PowerPage.org, AppleInsider and Think Secret—in the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, California.

      The complaint claimed that the sites published trade secrets about upcoming Apple products, and requested subpoenas to help uncover the identity of anonymous sources that allegedly fed the information to the Web sites.

      /zimages/6/28571.gifClick here to read more about Apples complaint.

      This follows Thursdays tentative ruling by Judge Kleinberg against the sites, stating that they were not entitled to protection under First Amendment Reporters Privilege or the California Constitution Reporters Shield.

      The delay was sparked, according to a representative for the EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation), which is representing PowerPage.org and AppleInsider, by the judges decision to take under consideration the EFFs motion for a protective order.

      This order, if granted by Judge Kleinberg, would prevent Apple from filing subpoenas against the defendants in order to uncover the identity of the Web sites anonymous sources, as well as requesting unpublished documents related to the resulting published stories.

      /zimages/6/28571.gifRead more here about rumor site Think Secret retaining a lawyer for its defense against the lawsuit by Apple.

      In making their case, Apples lawyers purported to define what a valid journalist is based on the code of ethics created by the SPJ (Society of Professional Journalists).

      The code includes, under the rubric “Journalists should,” guidelines such as “Always question sources motives before promising anonymity” and “identify sources whenever feasible.”

      However, this sparked one of the coauthors of the SPJs code, Peter Sussman, a former editor for the San Francisco Chronicle, to write a letter to Apple CEO Steve Jobs and Apples lawyer in this case, in protest.

      “I wrote in a personal capacity,” Sussman said, “but I am certain all members of the [ethics] committee would agree with me.”

      “Its a misuse of the code to use it for any legal definitional purpose,” said Sussman.

      In his letter, Sussman wrote that “to cite the Code to support a particular interpretation … or in any way to define who is or is not a journalist… is an inappropriate use of the Code and was never intended by its framers and would horrify every one of them.”

      His letter continued, “Furthermore, acceptance of Apples apparently proposed rule, that only journalists who are professionally accredited or can survive an ethical audit should benefit from the protections of the First Amendment and California Constitution, would profoundly threaten the core mission of SPJ, which is the perpetuation of a free press as the cornerstone of our nation and our liberty. Accordingly, I strongly urge that Apple withdraw that argument as well as any subpoenas justified in whole or in part by that argument.”

      Sussmans position was seconded by Gary Hill, the chairman of the SPJs ethics committee.

      “We hope people follow the code,” he said, “but its suggestions, not a tool for enforcement. We would not support using our Code of Ethics to determine who is or isnt a journalist.”

      /zimages/6/28571.gifCheck out eWEEK.coms for the latest news, reviews and analysis on Apple in the enterprise.

      Avatar
      Daniel Drew Turner

      MOST POPULAR ARTICLES

      Android

      Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: Durability for Tough...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 5, 2020 0
      Have you ever dropped your phone, winced and felt the pain as it hit the sidewalk? Either the screen splintered like a windshield being...
      Read more
      Cloud

      Why Data Security Will Face Even Harsher...

      Chris Preimesberger - December 1, 2020 0
      Who would know more about details of the hacking process than an actual former career hacker? And who wants to understand all they can...
      Read more
      Cybersecurity

      How Veritas Is Shining a Light Into...

      eWEEK EDITORS - September 25, 2020 0
      Protecting data has always been one of the most important tasks in all of IT, yet as more companies become data companies at the...
      Read more
      Big Data and Analytics

      How NVIDIA A100 Station Brings Data Center...

      Zeus Kerravala - November 18, 2020 0
      There’s little debate that graphics processor unit manufacturer NVIDIA is the de facto standard when it comes to providing silicon to power machine learning...
      Read more
      Apple

      Why iPhone 12 Pro Makes Sense for...

      Wayne Rash - November 26, 2020 0
      If you’ve been watching the Apple commercials for the past three weeks, you already know what the company thinks will happen if you buy...
      Read more
      eWeek


      Contact Us | About | Sitemap

      Facebook
      Linkedin
      RSS
      Twitter
      Youtube

      Property of TechnologyAdvice.
      Terms of Service | Privacy Notice | Advertise | California - Do Not Sell My Information

      © 2021 TechnologyAdvice. All Rights Reserved

      Advertiser Disclosure: Some of the products that appear on this site are from companies from which TechnologyAdvice receives compensation. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site including, for example, the order in which they appear. TechnologyAdvice does not include all companies or all types of products available in the marketplace.

      ×